Tag Archives: CA-GOV

How Noble of You, Meg Whitman

As if she was reading from Ralph Nader’s new book, Only the Super Rich Can Save Us, Meg Whitman has come down from her ivory tower to inform the plebes that she will not be accepting the governor’s salary.

How generous of her.  She’s worth a billion, give or take a couple hundred million, and she’s willing to pass on the $200 K or so. Incidentally, the Bee has it on good authority that Tom Campbell will accept the salary (he’s not a billionaire, you know) and Poizner (who is) will also accept the salary.

Why do we need to know this?  Perhaps so that we can feel just how small we really are. It’s certainly not to solve any budget problems, as the amount of money won’t by itself really break the budget one way or the other.  No, this is a gesture that says to the people of California that she is making a big sacrifice to take this job, and that we should be thrilled to have her experience and ill-informed judgment to save us.

For the record, I’ll be happy to pay a governor for the work he does. We got the last one on the cheap, as Arnold isn’t accepting a salary either, and look what that got us.  Sometimes you get what you pay for.  And trust me, it’ll be worth it to pay the cash for a governor who has a clue about the problems facing the state, can reasonably discuss the issues, and isn’t there to shock doctrine the state.

Don’t do us any favors, Meg Whitman.

CarlyFornia Getting Real Serious

Carly Fiorina is officially announcing her candidacy today. Not much of a surprise really, considering her dipping of the toes process for the past few months.  She’s going to stream the announcement live from Garden Grove at 10AM, you can catch it here or over the flip.

But if you just can’t wait, well, she’s gone ahead and published an op-ed in the OC Register. It’s really just some seriously good times, and really I can’t think of a better way to start off an announcement than apologizing for not voting in the past:

Admittedly, I have not always been engaged in the electoral process, and I should have been. For many years I felt disconnected from the decisions made in Washington and, to be honest, really didn’t think my vote mattered because I didn’t have a direct line of sight from my vote to a result.

Just lovely, get the fact that you don’t think voting makes a real difference out there right away, and then wait until the second paragraph to say “Obviously I was wrong.”  It is really hard to think of a worse way to have to start off your campaign where you have to ask voters to, um, vote for you than by saying that as a leader of one of California’s largest companies you didn’t think it was worth your time to vote.  Niiice. But don’t worry, she’s got other reasons why she should lose to challenge Barbara Boxer.

Despite polls showing strong support for the public option in California, she’s going to replace real healthcare reform with tort deform!

Congress should reform medical malpractice to match what we have in California where frivolous lawsuits are a thing of the past. We should permit consumers to purchase health insurance from any company in the country, expanding consumer choice and driving down cost and unnecessary mandates.

People want to know that their care will stay where it belongs: in the hands of doctors and patients. Unfortunately, the path Congress is on in this debate is not giving us the confidence that it will.

And just if that isn’t enough, she wants to neuter the stimulus, that her pal and fellow Republican Arnold Schwarzenegger praised vocally yesterday.

Tax, spend and borrow is not a governing philosophy; it’s a cycle of dependency and it is one that must be broken. Washington must show the discipline to cut spending and create policies that encourage and empower businesses to put people back to work.

Ah, old school Republican word play, I can’t think of any way to connect to a heavily Democratic general electorate. Oh, right, she has to face down Chuck DeVore in that primary, where she doesn’t even have a substantial lead despite her supposed viability.  I hope Fiorina is steeling herself for the conservative onslaught, they are pissed from losing in NY-23 and are on the warpath.  DeVore’s right-wing messaging could be just the rallying cry they’ve been looking for.

Free video streaming by Ustream

Steve Poizner’s Speech at the WLB Breakfast Club

STEVE POIZNER: Thank you very much Mr. Speaker, good morning everybody. I do get to travel up and down the state quite a bit now, Mr. Speaker, giving speeches as I run for governor, also as Insurance Commissioner. Sometimes the introductions don’t go quite so well. I was at a high school recently not so far from here. Student stands up to introduce me, she has this incredibly bored look on her face. Her introduction of me was short and sweet. She said, this is Mr. Poizner, he’s been an engineering geek in Silicon Valley for 20 years. Now he’s into insurance. Sat down, that was the whole introduction. When I got home that evening I couldn’t resist going to talk to my 18-year old daughter Rebecca. I had to ask her, why did you introduce me that way? Sad but true. I’ve just got to say for the record, now that my daughter is out on the road driving, I lose sleep every night as your Insurance Commissioner with my daughter out there.

Now I haven’t been in politics very long. Most of my career here in California, starting and running high-tech companies in Silicon Valley. My last company was called SnapTrack, maybe you’ve heard of it. It was a company where we figured out a way to put Global Positioning Satellite Receivers, GPS Receivers into cell phone chips so that when you dial 9-1-1 from the cell phone, the emergency operators will know where you’re calling from. Now that turned out to be an important feature. About 700 million cell phones have this feature now, we’ve saved hundreds of lives, and I’m really quite proud of it. So I was really surprised when I was describing my last feat to Speaker Brown one day and he expressed some concerns. He said, you mean you can track my exact location when I’m carrying a cell phone? So I’m pleased to announce a new feature today, the company is rolling out for an additional $5 a month, the location technology will always show you at the library. I call it the Willie Brown feature. So I sold this company to Qualcomm a few years ago. Qualcomm, the big cell phone company in San Diego.

And after running companies for 20 years, I decided I just can’t sit on the sidelines any longer. I could see that California was going off of a cliff, that we were going through a meltdown. So I decided to put the private sector behind me and get involved in public sector service, helping to get this great state back on track. Now my first foray into public sector service was not to run for office, but actually be a school teacher. Now, we will never fix this broken state, we will never get California back on track ever until we repair our broken public school system. Do you know that 50% of the fourth graders, 50% of the fourth graders that go to California public schools cannot pass basic reading proficiency tests? 50%. So I couldn’t resist. I decided to plunge into the trenches, immerse myself in the details with other teachers to get a first-hand view of what happens in the public school system. Now little did I know how difficult it would be to get into the classroom. I thought they would embrace me with open arms. Well it didn’t work out exactly that way.

Now I live in Los Gatos with my wife and daughter, and there’s a school district near Los Gatos, about 30 minutes from my home, the East Side Union High School District. That’s in East San Jose maybe you’ve been there. It’s got 25,000 high school kids, 12 high schools in this particular district. So one day a few years ago I decided just to drive to the district office and volunteer. No appointment made, just drove there, walked into this massive building, this district office. Went up to the receptionist, introduced myself, I’m Steve Poizner, I’d like to volunteer and teach. I’m not looking to be compensated, I just want to learn as much as I can, I want to help as much as I can. And the receptionist looked at me, kind of tilted her head, what? Never heard that one before. Hang on a second. So she goes to the back to get the head of personnel who hires teachers for the East Side Union High School District.

I’m never going to forget this, it was during lunch, she comes out, she has this kind of irritated look on her face because I disrupted her lunch. She had a little mustard on her lip, and she asked me, what can I do for you? And I said, well I’d like to teach, not looking to be paid, I want to help, I want to learn. And she says, well what qualifies you to be in the classroom? Now I had to think about that for a second. Okay, well I have an electrical engineering degree from the University of Texas, graduated number one in my class. Then I came out to Stanford Business School, got an MBA from Stanford with Honors, and then I spent 20 years starting and running high-tech companies in Silicon Valley very successfully, and then last year I was in the White House in the National Security Council in the counterterrorism group. I got there one week before the 9-11 Crisis, I had a security clearance well above top secret. I helped build the new homeland security plan for the whole country. Without missing a beat she looks at me, she says, nothing you just said qualifies you to be in the classroom. Now, I don’t have a very big ego, but it shrank in size as she sent me packing that day.

I wasn’t going to take no for an answer, so I went home, got on the phone, called the 12 high school principals directly, left them voicemails, I want to teach at your high school. None of them called me back, except one. Art Darren from Mount Pleasant High School got me on the phone and said — you want to do what? Well I want to teach at your school. Have you been here? It’s hard. I said, yes I’d like to teach at your school. Why don’t you sign me up. So he went to the superintendent and got guest teacher status for me from the district. I taught 12th grade American Government at Mount Pleasant High School for a year a few years ago. I’ve got to tell you, gang members and all, it was the hardest thing I’ve ever done. Ever, by far. And the most rewarding. And I’ll be back to the classroom some day, but I’ve got to tell you, what an eye-opener being in the classroom with other teachers for an extended period of time.

I’ll never forget my first day, it rained in San Jose that day. And my classroom leaked. I had to position the trash can in the right spot to collect the rain water. Now, hang on a second, this is a public high school in wealthy San Jose with a leaky roof. That’s shameful. Really. Who runs the school at Mount Pleasant High School? How come they cannot fix the roof at Mount Pleasant High School? Well as it turns out, I can tell you for sure, the teachers, the principals, they don’t run the schools. Who does? Well as it turns out in the last several decades, the Legislature has just ripped control of the public schools out of the hands of local folks and they’ve moved it to Sacramento.

Now how many here went to California public schools? Well you all know. In the 1960s and ’70s, we had the best public education system in the country, bar none. We know how to educate kids. What’s changed over the last 20 or 30 years? Well, the education code for one. Now the education code are these mandates the Legislature applies uniformly to all 5,000 schools at the same time. That’s kind of nonsense on the face of it. Now, in the 1960s when we had the best education system in the country, the size of the education code was about this size, now the education code is this size, 2,000 pages long and growing rapidly.

Clearly, one of the key solutions to our problems, one of the reasons why I’m running for governor is I’m going to rip control of the public schools out of the hands of Sacramento politicians and I’m going to move it down to the local level where it belongs and where it used to be. Now, I’m so convinced that local control, I’m so passionate about local control that I’m one of the pioneers of the California charter school movement. Now I don’t know if you’ve been watching the charter school movement in California very closely or not. It is the most improved public education reform activity going on right now, in my opinion, in California. When I got involved 10 years ago with Reed Hastings and others, there was just a handful of charter schools. There’s now 800 of them in California. 800 charter schools, 5% of all public school kids now go to charter schools. Charter schools are public schools but the state education code is waived for charter schools. They have the kind of local control that they need in order to customize programs to meet the needs of local kids.

As governor, I’m just telling you, I’m going to take the same type of freedom and flexibility that charter schools have, we’re going to apply them to all schools. And in addition, we’re going to drive more money back down into the classroom. It is an incredibly bureaucratic massive organization that runs our California public school system. And this is what I learned from the other California school teachers that I taught with. 5,0000 schools report to 1,000 school districts. Well hang on a second, some of these school districts have just one school. In fact, hundreds of these school districts have just one school. No matter the size of the school district, you have a staff and a superintendent and a lot of expenses. These staffs and school districts report to the 58 county boards of education. Each county board has a staff and a superintendent and a board an all. These 58 county boards of education report to – well, it’s not clear.

There’s the elected Superintendent of Public Instruction, there’s the Secretary of Education, there’s the State Board of Education, and there’s the Department of Education. Incredibly fragmented. And then overlay the 2,000 pages of the state education code and you have one dysfunctional system. Now, there’s 600,000 people who work in K-12 in California, 600,000. And over half of them are not in the classroom.

Now, how do we fix these things? Well the fact is, teachers are very angry right now that it’s no longer a profession. They’re set up for failure. Now I’m an engineer. I’m an entrepreneur. I’m a problem solver. And I want to get together with teachers and educators and business folks, folks from across the political spectrum. California is in a huge crisis right now and it’s time for all of us to get together and implement some common sense solutions like I’m describing here so we can get not only the public schools  back on track, so that we can get California back on track. Thank you all very much for the invitation to be here. Thank you, appreciate it.

CA-Gov: Brown’s Canoe Theory is DLC Triangulation

John Wildermuth thinks Jerry Brown’s pretty much got the nomination wrapped up, and you can’t blame him for that.  So, he points to all of the random crap that much of the left won’t mind so much, but will scare the bejeezus out of the conservative base. Sure, nobody will be that surprised to hear the name Rose Bird, but I kind of doubt it will be determinative in either the primary or general election.

But what I find most striking about the column isn’t the “bulls-eye” stuff, it is a reminder of Brown’s “Canoe Theory.”

For years, Brown’s “canoe theory” of government has worked in California: “You paddle a little bit on the left, then you paddle a little bit on the right and you keep going straight down the middle.” He’s far from the only politician who’s tried to play to both ends of the political spectrum, but he’s one of the very few who has done it successfully over such a long career.

The crusading candidate for secretary of state in 1970 was very different from the pro-development, law-and-order Oakland mayoral hopeful of 1998, but both versions had something in common: they won. (Fox&Hounds-John Wildermuth)

I’m not going to judge here, I’m simply going to point this out. This is essentially the Joe Lieberman/Democratic Leadership Council triangulation theory. Nothing new here, or at least nothing that Jerry Brown’s nemesis, Bill Clinton, didn’t talk about endlessly in the late 80s and early 90s.

It’s one of the funny things about all of the “Governor Moonbeam” stuff. While he did play in some interesting spiritual realms in the 80s, politically he has pretty much been a creature of his times, sticking close to the conventional wisdom. See Proposition 13 for that.

But, when it comes down to it, Brown is a general election candidate, and knows how to close them out.  With Newsom out, he’s got a road to the old gig paved and decked out with a red carpet. Whether the red carpet remains clean is up to some other Democrats.

CA-Gov: Will There Be Another Candidate?

In today’s Willie Brown column, Willie praises Gavin Newsom for “having the courage” to drop out of the race, he speaks that which the Chronicle’s news section, as well as the LA Times, refuses to admit is a possibility: there just might be another candidate on the Democratic side.

But it is absolutely necessary for a politician to have that type of courage if he wants a long career. And make no mistake, Newsom still has a future. He is still a tremendous communicator.

Although Attorney General Jerry Brown comes out the early winner in Newsom’s withdrawal, I have to believe there are many Democrats out there who still say, “Can’t we find someone with a newer paint job?”

Two names have already popped up: Rep. Jane Harman, D-Venice (Los Angeles County), and Maria Shriver. (SF Chronicle 11/1/09)

For a few weeks these rumors have been going about.  There a number of reasons for this, the big one being that there is money sitting out of this race.  This is more than just your normal money sitting out of the race for economic reasons, but some typical players that didn’t take a side. That could have been that they were leaning away from Brown and weren’t sure about how long Newsom could survive. Or that Newsom wasn’t able to extract money and just tried for the second best and asked people to hold off on giving money to Brown.

Jerry Brown has a lot of inherent advantages in the race, yet he’s certainly not unbeatable.  Brown coould yet lose to a well-funded candidate, especially if that well-funded candidate was a minority, a woman, or a combination of the two. Harman carries baggage with the base, and the word on the street is that she may not be able to self-finance her campaigns going forward.  Shriver carries some baggage of her own, prinicipally from being married to a rather poor governor.

But those two names are not the only two taking a look at the calculus of the 2010 governor’s race. If I were to be putting odds on somebody else getting into the race, I think I’d peg it at slightly better than even money, maybe 60%.

Oh the Tumult of Trying to Prove You’re a Real Republican

In the Democratic primary, there’s really not much conversation to speak of. Basically, you have Gavin Newsom running around trying to increase name ID by conducting town halls and the like. Jerry Brown is just patiently waiting back for the spring, or so it seems.

But that is hardly the case on the Republican side. The three candidates have been lobbing hand grenades at each other for several months now. Two of them, Poizner and Whitman, are former CEOs who have given money to, gasp, Democrats.  The other, Tom Campbell, is a self-described champion of bipartisanship.

But how do you show the right-wingers of the party, ie the party base, that you are the Real Republican. Well, if you’re Tom Campbell, you don’t try, and just call yourself bipartisan. I know that might work to pull in 20% in early polls, but that strategy seems like quite the longshot in a Republican primary that tends to skew hard right.

Meanwhile, as Poizner and Whitman go for the “conservative” mantle, they have to deal with their Democratic skeletons in the closet:

Whitman gave $4,000 to Boxer in November 2003 and an additional $4,000 to Boxer and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee that same month, according to the Federal Election Commission.

Whitman also endorsed Boxer in 2003 as a member of the group Technology Leaders for Boxer. In a joint letter publicized by the Boxer campaign, Whitman wrote, “Barbara Boxer is a courageous leader and friend of California’s technology industry.”

*** *** ***

Poizner has faced similar questions about his contributions to Gore and the Gore/Lieberman Recount Committee, which funded the Democratic candidate’s unsuccessful legal efforts in the aftermath of the 2000 election. (SacBee 10/26/09)

Of course, that they each have these issues takes out much of the teeth out of this fight. Unless Tom McClintock is somehow lured into this race, Whitman and Poizner are only judged on a curve defined by the other.  If a longtime Republican conservative enters the race, the complexion changes markedly. However, at this point the field seems to have solidified.  McClintock is really the only name conservative that would be able to have a major impact on the race.

So, press releases are tossed back and forth on who is the Real Republican, and still the phrase has no meaning and no value to the bulk of California voters.

Jerry Brown Files Lawsuit Against State Street Bank, Doesn’t Like CNBC

Attorney General Jerry Brown  announced that he was suing State Street Bank today.

California sued State Street Bank and Trust today for allegedly committing “unconscionable fraud” against the state’s two largest public pension funds, and seeks more than $200 million in overcharges and penalties.

Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown contends that the Boston investment banking firm overcharged the California Public Employees Retirement System and the California State Teachers Retirement System by about $50 million for the costs of carrying out foreign currency trades since 2001. (LA Times 10/20/09)

See, the thing is here that the Big Banks have been putting their fingers in the taxpayer pocket, and now they are getting called out on it.  This case was presented to the AG’s office from a whistle blower, so it will be interesting to see the case when it becomes more clear and to see if there are any ramifications beyond just the money.

Now this CNBC interview is something to behold really. It was going smoothly, until AG Brown was asked about what whether he is pursuing the case against State Street for political reasons.  The question was well, typical CNBC, cynical and meant to protect their own, the big financial companies.  That being said, Brown’s response was, well, very Jerry Brown. Nobody will mistake him for Arnold Schwarzeneggers’ on-screen presence.  The whole interview is worth a watch, but the fireworks start around 3:25.

What Would You Ask Gavin Newsom?

San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom isn’t new to controversy, and the decision to publicly endorse a constitutional convention is just that. It’s a big move, but speaks to the underlying need for change in Sacramento. Whether it’s the right move for California is still open to interpretation.

On Wednesday at 5 PM, Calitics will be co-hosting an online town hall with Mayor Newsom.  I’ll be moderating, asking questions, and generally requiring lots of answers about his vision for the state of California, what sort of change he’ll bring, and how he’ll work with the existing structure to bring about needed reform.

So, I’m looking for questions. What do you want to know from Mayor Newsom? Want to know whether he thinks water issues should be in the constitutional convention? Or Prop 13? Or social issues? How would he work with Republican legislators to approach reform?

Lay the Qs on me, here, on the Calitics facebook fan page, or via twitter (I’m @Brian_Leubitz).  

We’ll have the Ustream available on Calitics Wednesday at 5 PM; you can also catch it at Ustream.com/GavinLive. Full details and RSVP information over the flip.

P.S. If any other statewide candidates are reading this, and would like to do an audio or video live stream with myself or another Calitics editor, let me know. I’m very interested in bringing the candidates to the progressive netroots.

RSVP information.  

You can participate from your own computer on facebook or http://Ustream.com/GavinLive and ask questions.

What:    Online, Video Town Hall with Mayor Gavin Newsom and Calitics.com

When:   Wednesday, October 21 at 5:00 pm

RSVP:  GavinNewsom.com/onlinetownhall (appreciated but not required)

I hope you will join us online this Wednesday, October 21 at 5:00 pm for this discussion.  

As If On Cue, Gavin Newsom Releases Ad Calling for Major Reforms

In my previous entry I called for Democratic candidates to seize the moment created by the public’s rejection of Arnold Schwarzenegger and offer a vision of change to fix California’s problems.

Almost as if on cue, Gavin Newsom’s campaign released an online ad this morning emphasizing those points. One of the things I find so interesting is that it mentions not once, but twice, both the Constitutional Convention and eliminating the 2/3rds rule. Newsom is positioning himself as the candidate of not just “change” but of structural reform:

With the first snows falling in the Sierra, will Jerry Brown respond with a vision of his own for California’s future? Or will he continue to espouse his party like it’s 1978 vision?

The ball is now in Brown’s court, with a solid first serve by Newsom.