Tag Archives: Immigration

Royce, Bilbray, and the Immigration “Hall of Shame”

This week, it’s the 104th anniversary of Ellis Island’s one-day peak – the day when more immigrants were welcomed than any other in American history. On April 17, 1907, 11,747 immigrants became Americans – and that was just at Ellis Island.

Today, 104 years later, America is stuck in the mud with a broken immigration system. Americans want reform that unites families, promotes fair employment practices, and restores America’s place as a nation that welcomes those seeking freedom from persecution and a better way of life.

This week, Immigrants’ List — a bipartisan political action committee dedicated to electing pro-immigration lawmakers – unveiled the 2011 inductees into the Immigration Hall of Shame. In the Hall of Shame are California’s own, Reps. Ed Royce (#3) and Brian Bilbray (#6), who have earned places alongside the likes of Michele Bachmann and Steve King.

Hall of Shame – April 2011 Inductees

1. Rep. Steve King (R-IA) – A man who cites the Bible in his opposition to immigration reform, King favors an electrified wire border fence, arguing “we do that with livestock all the time.” King believes that undocumented immigrants can be detected from their clothing and “the type of grooming they might have,” and labeled the DREAM Act “amnesty.” Alarmingly, King vice chairs the House Immigration Subcommittee – the first stop for every immigration bill.

2. Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) – According to Lamar Smith, the guaranteed 14th Amendment right to birthright citizenship is a “misinterpretation,” which Smith plans to remedy with a ban on that right that can “get five votes” on the Supreme Court. Such a posture would be troubling enough from any member of Congress, but coming from the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, it’s downright dangerous.

3. Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA) – After calling for a national version of the Arizona SB 1070, Royce has announced new legislation to give local police Arizona-style powers over immigration. An active leader in the House’s leading anti-reform caucus, Royce supports forcing hospitals to gather information on possible undocumented immigrants, and opposes increasing visas for skilled workers.

4. Rep. Peter King (R-NY) – Always a lightning rod of controversy, Peter King has been in the headlines recently for scapegoating Muslim citizens. But we should remember that King has a long history of scapegoating and marginalizing all immigrants; he fought to ban the use of Spanish by government agencies and authored a bill to ban drivers’ licenses for undocumented workers because they are “potential terrorists.” King chairs the Homeland Security Committee, which has a major role in immigration reform legislation.

5. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) – The potential presidential candidate has a history of inflammatory statements which go along with her outlandish voting record. She’s spread the widely-debunked rumor that Phoenix is “the kidnap[ping] capital of the United States,” using that myth to justify her support for an armed presence on the border. She’s advocates Arizona SB 1070, and told Bill O’Reilly that all local law enforcement should be required to ask for proof of immigration status. Bachmann chairs the House Tea Party Caucus.

6. Rep. Brian Bilbray (R-CA) – Having built a career spreading fear about our broken border, Bilbray now helms the House’s anti-immigration reform caucus, where he’s leading the fight for an Arizona SB 1070-style bill. Discontent with mere anti-immigrant legislation, Bilbray has spread rumors that President Obama will issue amnesty by decree, and “the human smuggling, prostitution, murder and virtual enslavement of human beings” is happening because immigrants are “drawn to this nation by… taxpayer-funded jobs.”

7. Sen. John Boozman (R-AR) – While campaigning for Senate last year, Boozman wrote that “our schools, our hospitals and our jobs are being compromised by the influx of illegal immigrants.” His solution? Eliminating the Constitutional right to birthright citizenship, reducing overall legal immigration, and spreading rumors that President Obama “may grant amnesty through an Executive Order.”

8. Rep. Heath Shuler (D-NC) – In word and deed, Shuler is eager to prove that obstructionism is bipartisan. The top Democrat in Congress’s largest anti-reform caucus, he worked with Tom Tancredo to author the SAVE Act, which would deport 12 million undocumented immigrants, was backed by NumbersUSA, and would’ve taken a large step towards militarizing America’s border.

9. Rep. Candice Miller (R-MI) – One of the leading proponents of the baseless rumor that the Obama administration is behind a “backdoor amnesty” program, Candice Miller chairs the Homeland Security Border Subcommittee. She co-sponsored the deportation-only SAVE Act, and won the support of Lou Dobbs for her fear-mongering that undocumented workers will gain political power due to the 2010 Census counting “persons,” not “citizens.”

10. Rep. Ben Quayle (R-AZ) – Heralded as a “true reformer” by the notoriously anti-immigration NumbersUSA, Ben Quayle exemplified the worst political impulses when it comes to immigration, exploiting fear and misinformation to ride into office. Quayle made election promises to reduce the overall number of immigrants allowed in America, erect a Pacific-to-the-Gulf electrified fence, and send the National Guard to patrol the border. These efforts may have won him the support of Chuck Norris, but here’s a fact for Chuck Norris and Ben Quayle: your scare tactics draw out the status quo – preventing meaningful reform, breaking up families, and putting America at risk.

Immigration is a fundamental part of America’s heritage and is essential to the growth and prosperity of our nation. That’s a fact. It’s central to our American character.

And it’s something these ten have forgotten.

View the Hall of Shame, share with friends, and sign-up for more information at our website.

Elton Gallegly’s Anti-Immigration Strategy: Ruin California’s Economy

Rep. Elton Gallegly is the Chair of the House Subcommittee on Immigration. He’s also one of the most egregiously anti-immigrant leaders in Congress, pushing a strategy to force a mass deportation, cleverly couched as “attrition through enforcement.”

Unfortunately, Gallegly’s zeal to get tough on immigrants would have profound consequences for California and the rest of the United States.

California’s agriculture and food production are the envy of the world.  The state’s farmers not only help feed the world, but keep prices low and jobs here in the United States.  Yet this great agricultural machine is under assault by one of California’s own members of Congress: Elton Gallegly.  Instead of embracing the business-labor compromise bill known as AgJOBS that would legalize farm workers and make changes to the H-2A guest worker program, Gallegly is trying to divide the business community from labor leaders and destabilize the agriculture industry in the process. 

Gallegly has already held hearings that tried to pit Latinos against African Americans. (His hometown paper, the Ventura County Star, reported on March 1, 2011 “Immigration hearing turns into racial battle”) and designed to create tension between native-born citizens and naturalized citizens, which Rep. Xavier Becerra (CA-31) blasted as “scapegoating on steroids.” 

Gallegly’s next hearing is titled, “The H-2A Visa Program – Meeting the Growing Needs of American Agriculture?”  His approach is to insist that the solution to our farm labor crisis is an employer-friendly guest worker program, instead of the thoughtful, realistic, bipartisan approach embodied by AgJOBS that includes stronger labor rights for workers, changes to the visa program desired by employers, and a way for undocumented farm workers to earn legal status if they have worked in the agriculture industry.

Gallegly knows that California’s agriculture industry is dependent on a foreign-born and mostly unauthorized workforce.  Yet, due to our broken immigration system, the foreign-born workers who comprise the overwhelming majority of our agricultural workers have few avenues to become legalized and, without them, farmers have few avenues to keep their farms operating at full capacity.  It’s already bad enough. But, Gallegly is intent upon making a bad situation worse.  Importing new workers through a revised H-2A program, and deporting the seasoned workers who have been here for years, is not the answer.  A reasonable approach, like the AgJOBS legislation, is.

But the impact of Gallegly’s policy prescriptions will not just hurt agriculture.

Not too far north of Gallegly’s district lies another of California’s economic crown jewels: Silicon Valley.  According to Tech Crunch, the U.S. immigration policies are having a devastating impact on entrepreneurship:

NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Brokaw visited Silicon Valley last month to meet immigrant entrepreneurs. At Microsoft’s Mountain View campus, he met with a dozen of them. More than half said that they might be forced to return to their home countries. That’s because they have the same visa issues that Kunal Bahl had. Unable to get a visa that would allow him to start a company after he graduated from Wharton in 2007, Kunal returned home to India. In February 2010, he started SnapDeal—India’s Groupon. Instead of creating hundreds of jobs in the U.S., Kunal ended up creating them in New Delhi.

At a time when our economy is stagnating, some American political leaders are working to keep the world’s best and brightest out. They mistakenly believe that skilled immigrants take American jobs away. The opposite is true: skilled immigrants start the majority of Silicon Valley startups; they create jobs.

Meanwhile, entrepreneurship is booming in countries that compete with us. And more than half a million doctors, scientists, researchers, and engineers in the U.S. are stuck in “immigration limbo”. They are on temporary work visas and are waiting for permanent-resident visas, which are in extremely short supply. These workers can’t start companies, justify buying houses, or grow deep roots in their communities. Once they get in line for a visa, they can’t even accept a promotion or change jobs. They could be required to leave the U.S. immediately—without notice—if their employer lays them off.  Rather than live in constant fear and stagnate in their careers, many are returning home.

Constant fear is what Gallegly is instilling in immigrants across the economic spectrum.

California’s economy, from Silicon Valley to the Central Valley and much of the rest of the state, relies on the labor of immigrants. And, it’s no secret that California’s economy is already in a precarious state.  A report from the Immigration Policy Center documented the positive economic effect immigrants have on the state:

A 2008 study by the California Immigrant Policy Center concludes that immigrants in California pay roughly $30 billion in federal taxes, $5.2 billion in state income taxes, and $4.6 billion in sales taxes each year. In California, “the average immigrant-headed household contributes a net $2,679 annually to Social Security, which is $539 more than the average US-born household. Additionally, “immigrants are among California’s most productive entrepreneurs and have created jobs for tens of thousands of Californians. By 2000, immigrant owners of Silicon Valley companies had created 72,829 jobs and generated more than $19.5 billion in sales.”

A report from the Congressional Budget Office, The Role of Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market: An Update, noted the major role of immigrants in California:

The foreign-born labor force is disproportionately located in certain states, and in those states, its members make up a substantial share of the total labor force. In 2009, 6 million of the 24 million foreign-born members of the labor force resided in California alone, and another 9 million lived in just five additional states—New York, Florida, Texas, New Jersey, and Illinois. A third of the labor force in California was foreign born, as was over a fifth of the labor force in the other five states. By comparison, in the remaining 44 states, the foreign born made up less than 10 percent of the labor force.

Instead of creating jobs, Gallegly is scaring workers with the threat of deportation. Instead of bolstering his state’s economy, Gallegly’s obsession with deporting immigrants or hiring replacement workers through an employer-friendly guest worker program could seriously damage it.

Cross-Posted at America's Voice. 

DREAM ACT Eligible City College of SF Student Facing Deportation in AZ

On September 15, 2010, life as Shing Ma “Steve” Li knew it ended suddenly. On that warm summer morning about a month and half ago, two men knocked on the door of his San Francisco apartment. Inside, 20-year-old Steve was getting ready for a full day of classes at the City College of San Francisco. He could not have imagined that within the next couple hours he would be arrested and detained as a fugitive criminal. In the ensuing two days, Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) processed Steve and his mother and sent them to their detention facility in Sacramento. Several weeks later, he was moved to the ICE detention center in Florence, Arizona, where he now awaits deportation.

Steve had no idea of his family’s status. Though he was born in Lima, Peru on July 3, 1990, Steve grew up right here in San Francisco. He attended Francisco Middle School and graduated from George Washington High School in 2008. Of ethnic Chinese dissent, Steve’s family arrived in San Francisco in 2002 after escaping from hardships in Peru. His parents came to America hoping for a fresh start. Steve was currently enrolled at the City College of San Francisco and was preparing to transfer to San Francisco State University where he planned on studying to become a nurse.

Sadly, Steve could have been spared this awful situation if Congress had passed the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, also known as the DREAM Act. This bill provides relief for certain inadmissible or deportable alien students who arrived in the U.S. as children, who graduate from US high schools, who are of good moral character, and have been in the country continuously for at least five years prior to the bill’s enactment. Qualifying students have the opportunity to earn conditional permanent residency if they complete two years in the military or two years of schooling at a four-year institution of higher learning.

The DREAM Act will get another vote later this year, as an amendment to the National Defense Reauthorization Act. The DREAM Act has bipartisan co-sponsors, and majority of the Senate has voted for it in the past. We hope and pray that Congress will pass the DREAM Act this year.

I was Steve’s professor at City College of San Francisco, and along with Steve’s other teachers and friends, we are writing to everyone we know to publicize Steve’s unjust detention, to educate people about the DREAM Act, and to try to forestall Steve’s deportation in the hope that the DREAM Act will be passed through Congress this year.

Steve Li had a bright future ahead of him. He was a good student at the City College of San Francisco. He was well on his way to achieving his dream of becoming a nurse and helping others. As I said, he began preparing to transfer to San Francisco State University by enrolling in San Francisco State’s Summer Science Institute, an intensive program that supports undergraduate students pursuing a career in health care. This past summer, he was at the Summer Science Institute at 8am every weekday working on his Biology, Chemistry, and Physics prerequisites.

However, Steve’s dreams and his life were shattered into a million pieces when ICE came knocking at his door. His parents had applied for asylum in 2004, but were denied and their visas eventually ran out. Steve was not even aware that he had overstayed his visa until the ICE agents raided his home last month. Steve and his parents were all initially incarcerated in San Francisco, but Steve was forcibly separated from his family when his parents were subsequently released on October 4th. His parents are Chinese nationals, but because Steve was born in Peru, he was transferred to a detention center in Arizona to be processed for immediate deportation. He is only 20 years old, and has never lived away from home. Nevertheless, the U.S. government and ICE has ripped this child away from his family and locked him up like a criminal for something over which he had no control.

Steve has no family or friends in Peru.  If he were deported, he would be homeless and alone upon arrival. Sadly, he will be deported soon unless we can mobilize our elected officials to do the right thing. America is Steve’s home. It is no fault of his that he finds himself in this situation. Why would we send this young man to a country he hasn’t lived in since he was in elementary school? Steve is a young man with immense potential, and he has never been in trouble with the law. He has worked hard to help support his family and pay for his own education. He only wants the opportunity to complete his education and give back to the country that he has called home for most of his life. Isn’t this the exact type of person we want to keep in our country?

Please help us circulate Steve’s story: Send online petitions (links below) to our California senators and representatives in support of Steve and the DREAM Act, and write about Steve on blogs, Twitter, or Facebook. We need to get the word out!!!! If you have media contacts, let them know about this story.

UPDATES:

1) SF City Council Member Eric Mar is introducing a resolution on behalf of Steve to the SF Board of Supervisors next week.

2) On October 28, 2010, the CCSF Board of Trustees passed a unanimous resolution demanding officials stop Steve’s deportation.

3) SF Chronicle was set to run a story on Steve’s case. We are unsure when though we were told last Saturday

4) World Journal has done a story.  

5) Sing Tao is also working on a story

6) Contra Costa Times ran a story last Friday, and they are working on a follow up:

http://www.contracostatimes.co…

7) Univision radio and television has also picked up on the story

Radio:

http://radioinformativa.univis…

TV:

http://radioinformativa.univis…

WHAT ELSE YOU CAN DO!!!!!

1) Please support Steve by directing your friends, family, and colleagues to our online petition at: http://bit.ly/bringstevehome

2) We are organizing Call-In parties across several California college campuses for this Tuesday and Wednesday.

Even if you’re not attending a “call in party,” still show your support by calling:

Senator Feinstein: (415) 393-0707

Senator Boxer: (415) 403-0100

For John Morton (ICE Director): (202) 282-8495

If voicemail box full, call live line (202) 732-3000

SCRIPTS BELOW

Senator Scripts – “Hi I’m calling to urge Sen. Feinstein/Boxer/Director Morton to sponsor a private bill for Shing Ma “Steve” Li, who faces deportation any day now. He is an asset to our community. I ask that Sen. Feinstein/Boxer intervene today.”

If asked Steve’s A# (Alien Registration Number) is 076-143-010

Morton Script – “Hi, I’m calling to leave a message of support for Shing Ma “Steve” Li A#076-143-010 who is going to be deported any day know. Steve is pursuing a degree in nursing and he is an asset to our community. I ask that John Morton please step in and defer his deportation, thank you.

If asked Steve’s A# (Alien Registration Number) is 076-143-010

3) GET the WORD OUT! We have gotten some press from the media outlets listed below, but we need to get some serious media attention on this case or Steve will be deported! Please circulate Steve’s story in the blogosphere and beyond! We are holding a press conference/rally next Friday Nov 5th (12 pm) on the City College of San Francisco’s Ocean campus. Pass this info onto to interested individuals in the Bay Area who might want to come out to support Steve Li.

Eric Hogue: There Is More than One Latino Assembly Member?

This is really classic GOP. Insensitivity bordering on the farcical, connecting dots that aren’t really there and a whole lot more.  Really good stuff.  Here’s the story, apparently an aide to Asm. Hector De La Torre had some documentation problems.  Mr. Hogue, who is something of a nativist from his perch in Sacramento minor radio personality land, decides that this is a great opportunity to bash Jerry Brown.

Why? Well, because Asm. De La Torre has endorsed Jerry for the governorship. So, you know, every Democrat’s problems are Jerry’s problems now.  But it gets better.  Hogue tries to increase the connection by showing that De La Torre was quoted on Brown’s website.  The only problem?  It was actually Asm. Kevin De Leon who was quoted.  Hogue has since changed the site, so here’s a screen grab that I took:

Hogue 1

As I said, the post is still up, but it has now been changed. Unfortunately, they didn’t really clean up after themselves, and now it just doesn’t even make sense:

Assemblyman De La Torre is quoted  is listed on Jerry Brown’s campaign website:

Southern California Latino leaders today joined together to announce their support for Jerry Brown’s campaign for Governor and decry Republican Meg Whitman’s anti-Latino positions and deceptive campaign tactics.

I guess when you are trying to spin this hard, sometimes you are going to confuse yourself. Or maybe to Hogue “Hector de La Torre” = “Kevin De Leon”?  Who knows, but this immigration story just continues to control the media narrative.

Over the flip, find a screen grab with more of the post.

Hogue 2

The eMeg Immigration Saga Continues

At some level, you really have to feel for the woman at the center of the Whitman “housekeepergate” story, Nicky Diaz Santillan.  She is an undocumented immigrant, and she has now exposed herself to the world, and ICE.  It’s not an easy thing to do.  But at another level, the story is deeply intriguing, from both personal and political standpoints.  Today, Meg Whitman, and Gloria Allred, Ms. Diaz Santillan’s attorney, held back to back press conferences.  And, as this is the kind of stuff that makes gossip rags crazy, TMZ.com streamed both live.

I’ll just summarize Meg’s press conference: “Gloria Allred is a liar and a tool of Jerry Brown. Nicky is being manipulated by that shystress. Oh, and I’m so certain that Gloria Allred is a liar that I’ll take a polygraph.”

And Allred’s response? Well, I’ll let TMZ summarize

But today, Gloria produced the letter with what she says is a written command from Meg’s husband — “Nicky, please check this.”

Earlier today Whitman said she would take a polygraph test — but Gloria says Nicky doesn’t have to take a polygraph test because she has the letter as proof, and “the evidence speaks for itself.”

As for Whitman’s claim that Gloria is working with Jerry Brown to engineer a smear campaign — Gloria says she has not made any contribution to Brown’s current campaign and hasn’t had any contact recently with Brown or his people.

Take a look at the letter that the Whitman residence received.  Allegedly, the handwriting down at the bottom is that of Dr. Griff Harsh, Whitman’s husband. (yes, for real) So while Whitman said she didn’t receive the letter, apparently her husband did.

Of course, there is the other question that will be on the minds of Californians. If she thought of Nicky as family, then why did she treat her like somebody that could simply be tossed out.  You know, members of my family have done things that I really don’t like, and vice versa, but I’ll do everything that I can to stick up for them.  That’s what family is for.

But the Harsh-Whitman family, is, well, a bit harsh. Sure, she’ll build a dorm at Princeton to get her sons admitted, despite the fact that they were kicked out of several schools for racist attacks upon fellow students and general poor behavior, but fib on a few papers in order to make a life where you can eat and provide for your children? Well, you are persona non grata.

It’s a sad statement about our immigration system to be sure. It provided a very poor choice for Meg once she had the entire situation displayed in front of her.  But she took the easy way out. And that says a lot about her character.

Pete Wilson’s Resurgence

Pete Wilson has a long and sordid past in this state.  Casting aside some of his early work in San Diego, his run as Senator left something to be desired, to say the least. He considered himself a “fiscal conservative”, going so far as to go by the moniker of “Watchdog of the Treasury.”  Yet all the while, he was one of the bigger supporters of the Strategic Defense Initiative (“Star Wars”) in the Senate, despite the fact that SDI never showed any glimmer of actually being able to do anything.

And then, as he comes back to California to be governor as some sort of victory lap, where he proceed to well and truly make the situation worse.  He never met an insurance reform bill that he wouldn’t veto for a bit of campaign cash from the industry, and apparently couldn’t find room in his heart from a plea from Mother Theresa on a death penalty case.

Besides his cruel veto of a workplace discrimination protection measure for gay and lesbian Californians, he went on to pass the vile Proposition 187 along with his re-election bid of 1994.  He used the measure to beat Kathleen Brown over the head with the issue, despite the fact that the measure was unconstitutional on its face.  That it was later ruled as such by federal courts didn’t really make a difference for Wilson. After all, he had been re-elected.

Toss in a few anti-labor measures, and there you have a quick summary of Wilson’s career. I suppose at this juncture, I should point out the work he did for reparations for Japanese internment victims, but his record is hardly one of a lifelong commitment to civil rights.  So, this is where he re-enters the game in a big way.  He is now the co-chair of the campaigns of both Meg Whitman and Steve Cooley. And he’s doing everything he can for both of them.

To reduce Wilson’s role in Whitman’s campaign to the immigration issue or to one “tough as nails” radio ad, however, is to miss the significance of his involvement.

Early in the contest, Wilson’s support was significant in signaling to GOP insiders that Whitman, with no political experience, could run a credible campaign.

He came with a Rolodex full of donors and consultants, many of whom helped Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger win election. He also had the perspective of being a former two-term governor and U.S. senator. If Whitman cared to talk strategy, he is the the only Republican to have defeated her Democratic opponent in an election.(SacBee)

You think that’s some big involvement? How about the fact that Steve Cooley has said on numerous occasions that it was the former Governor that recruited him for the AG’s race, rather than the other way around.  Wilson has taken to the role of elder statesmen (or Obi-Wan as the article called him) of the GOP.

But this course is not without risks.  Californians should not forget his role in Prop 187, and his cynical use of families as a wedge issue. Or his fight against the right to organize through his so-called “paycheck protection” measure.  Wilson had it all planned out, and he is still trying to pull the strings on the marionettes. One can only hope we are better at seeing through Whitman than we were cutting through Wilson’s bull.

Meg Whitman Loves Latinos… Except When She Doesn’t

Where does Meg Whitman stand on immigration? Well, that all depends on when she’s being asked, where she’s being asked, and who is doing the asking.

* Last year, in an attempt to cater to her Republican base as she prepared for a heated primary, Whitman told reporters she believes the state should “prosecute illegal aliens and criminal aliens in all of our cities, in every part of California.”

* This spring, in a stark reversal, Whitman spoke out against the Arizona immigration law when it first passed in April.

* When Whitman’s primary opponent, Steve Poizner, began gaining traction by veering far to the right on immigration, Whitman’s campaign advisor, former Governor Pete Wilson, produced an anti-immigrant radio ad, touting Whitman’s opposition to “amnesty” and her plan to block immigrant families the having access to education, driver’s licenses and other vital services. He said she’d be “tough as nails” on immigration. Gov. Wilson is the notorious architect of Proposition 187, the initiative that sought to deny immigrant families these same basic rights.

* Whitman’s hypocrisy became even more evident when she told a reporter, “You haven’t seen an ad from me with the border fence,” while at the same time airing TV ads across the state that prominently feature the border fence.

* Just one week after winning the primary, Whitman again changed direction, and began airing Spanish-language ads during the World Cup, indicating she was against the Arizona immigration law.

* But in late July, she went on a conservative talk radio station and said she thinks the Arizona law should stand.

* One week later, Whitman opened a “Latino outreach” office in East LA, and was greeted with a mob of protesters, furious over her perpetual flip-flopping on immigration.

* At the same time, she was also being lambasted by the right-wing John & Ken show, again for flip-flopping on immigration.

[Edit by Robert: Click through to read the rest!]

By our count, Whitman has changed her position on immigration at least five times since announcing her candidacy. And in her cynical ploy to mask her true positions, Whitman managed to alienate both the left and the right… and certainly isn’t making a case to Latinos. A recent poll shows that Jerry Brown still has a commanding lead among Latinos — 42 percent for Brown compared to just 18 percent for Whitman.

That’s because California Latinos remember that Jerry Brown stood up for immigrant workers when he marched with Cesar Chavez and gave farmworkers the right to form and join unions to collectively protect themselves from being exploited at work. And they also remember that Whitman has been changing her mind on Latino issues whenever it suits her.

Columnist Thomas D. Elias points out this example:


In one of her Spanish-language ads, Whitman says “The Latino kids attending public schools in California today will be tomorrow’s doctors, engineers, businessmen and teachers. I want them to have the opportunity to go as far in life as their God-given talent will take them.”

Unless, notes Democratic Party communications director Tenoch Flores, “their hard work and talent take them to a California institution of higher learning.” If they make it there and their parents are illegal immigrants (regardless of the kids’ own status), Whitman’s policy statements say they shouldn’t be allowed to stay long. In the spring primary, she said such “Latino kids” should be banned or removed from community colleges and the Cal State and University of California systems. Will Latinos remember those declarations?

Our answer is yes, they do remember. And they will still remember in November, regardless as to how many more million-dollar ads Whitman airs.

Paid for by the California Labor Federation. Not authorized by a candidate or committee controlled by a candidate.

Whitman Speaks From Both Sides of Her Mouth

Meg Whitman has been getting really creative of late on the immigration issue. In Spanish language media, she’s been against SB 1070, Arizona’s immigration law, since, well, forever.  Meanwhile, in her native tongue, well, she’s singing a different tune.

Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman – who has campaign billboards and Spanish-language ads in California declaring “NO to the Arizona law” – told talk show hosts Wednesday that the same controversial immigration law should be allowed to stand in Arizona.

“You know, I’m running for the governor of California so I had to make a decision,” Whitman said. “Does the Arizona law make sense for California? And I have said no, I don’t think the Arizona law makes sense for California because we have a much bigger state with much bigger geography.”(SacBee)

You can grab the audio of the interview here. (h/t to Chris Kelly of Huffington Post).  But the sum total of her point is that, yeah, she’s cool with it being in Arizona, but just doesn’t want to pass it in California.  But in the end, let’s sort her mixed messages:

Meg Whitman supports SB 1070 in Arizona.

She can muddle through whatever she plans on saying to different portions of the media, but she can’t continue to do so without being called out for it.  John Kerry caught hell just for trying to explain Senate procedures. Those are arcane, but perhaps so is eMeg’s thought process here. She was against it before she was for it, before she was against it, before she was neutral(ish) on it.

Meg Whitman is just wrong for California.

UPDATE: I would be remiss if I didn’t include this Spanish ad from California Working Families. It was just released yesterday, and basically is all over Whitman for talking out of both sides of her mouth. Of course, instead of addressing the point of the ad, the Whitman campaign cries crocodile tears that Brown isn’t doing these ads himself. Attack the messenger all you want, how about the message?

Coming to a Farm Near You: Steven Colbert?

That’s right, you heard me. Stephen Colbert has accepted the United Farm Workers’ creative challenge to Americans of all stripes to head out to the fields and try their hands at picking fruit, if they want their danged jobs back so badly.

The campaign details are over at TakeOurJobs.org, where would-be farmworkers get matched with struggling growers and immigrant trainers.

Watch Colbert’s segment and see UFW’s Arturo Rodriguez explain what the campaign is all about, as well as how to say “Yes We Can-wich” in Spanish. (You won’t want to miss that).

The Take Our Jobs campaign has received tons of media attention for the way it directly challenges the oft-repeated claim that immigrants are simply “taking American jobs” instead of contributing to and strengthening our economy and our food security.

A couple recent headlines: Colbert teams up with  UFW over immigration (AP), Farmers Tackle  Immigration Issues (Miriam Jordan, Wall Street Journal), Farmworkers to Colbert: Immigration worries? Work in fields (Dylan Smith, Tucson Sentinel).

It’s even spawned DIY-videos and tales of bloggers (like The Unapologetic Mexican) and journalists (like Teresa Puente) heading out to the fields to take on anti-immigrant rhetoric.

The Tucson Sentinel’s Dylan Smith writes:  

The “Take Our Jobs” site asks interested parties to supply their name and area code to streamline the hiring process. It cautions, however, that “duties may include tilling the soil, transplanting, weeding, thinning, picking, cutting, sorting & packing of harvested produce. May set up & operate irrigation equip. Work is performed outside in all  weather conditions (Summertime 90+ degree weather) & is physically  demanding requiring workers to bend, stoop, lift & carry up to 50  lbs on a regular basis.”

According to Colbert, however, the excruciating summer heat and difficult conditions of farm work are no big deal:

“It was over 100 degrees this entire week  here. I did my show 22 minutes a night.”

Smith concludes:

“Somehow, undocumented workers are getting as much blame for our economic troubles as Wall Street, but missing from the immigration debate is an honest recognition that the food we all eat at home, in restaurants and work-place cafeterias, including those in the Capitol, comes to us from the labor of undocumented workers,” Rodriguez told the Tribune. “According to the federal government, more than 50 percent of the  workers laboring are undocumented.”

We are not only a nation “in denial about our food supply,” as Rodriguez has famously quipped, but a nation in denial about who’s to blame for our current economic crisis, aside from vulnerable scapegoats. This has led us to set aside common-sense solutions to fixing our broken immigration system and pursue radical, dangerous ones, like Arizona’s SB 1070, which law  enforcement says destroy community safety and shift the focus away from fighting crime.

More to the point, though, how do I get a front-row ticket to see Colbert struggling in the fields? Can’t wait for part 2 of the Take Our Jobs challenge.

Note: Cross-posted at America’s Voice.  

An Injustice in Our Immigration System

Cross-posted to Big Orange.

I don’t regularly talk about my husband’s work on Calitics, but I hope you will indulge me this one time. He’s a lawyer by profession, and usually his work isn’t really all that exciting to uninvolved parties.  However, he and his law partner Ken Seeger, are now working on a case that made the cover of the San Francisco Chronicle:

Unlike most people caught up in the U.S. immigration system, John Doe Xiong, an 88-year-old Laotian who fought on the American side during the Vietnam War, doesn’t want to stay in the United States. He wants to return to his home country to die.

All he needs, he says, is his Laotian passport, which immigration officers took in April 2008 and refuse to return. Xiong is asking a federal judge in San Francisco to retrieve the document and order the government to pay damages for withholding it.

“Mr. Xiong saved the lives of American pilots at the risk of his own, and now the immigration service won’t even return his passport,” said his lawyer, Kenneth Seeger. “He is a virtual hostage.”(SF Chronicle)

The basic story here is pretty simple.  Mr Xiong, a member of the Hmong people, fought for the Americans in Laos during the Vietnam War. The American involvement in Laos was something of a secret for a long time, but history now clearly shows our actions.  Since the Americans left, he was harassed and threatened, and ultimately fled to America, leaving his wife and children in Laos. Typically such a case would be a simple asylum case, with easy approval.

However, justice is not always simple in our immigration system, even when doled out in San Francisco. The feds denied the asylum request, and demanded that he be returned to Laos.

This is where it gets interesting. Mr. Xiong, now in poor health, actually wants to return to Laos and leave the country. However, he cannot do so unless he gets his Laotian passport back from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) people. And they seem intent on keeping it and sending him home only on their timetable, and in chains.

The law on this issue seems to run against the government. The government is only allowed to take an asylum requestor’s passport to inspect, not to retain it for any extended period.

The immigration laws are a labyrinth that can ensnare even those with the most honest intentions. This is why we cannot succumb to those who seek a border only reform, we need a real overhaul of our immigration laws to provide the system with a modicum of respect for our fellow human beings.