By Lynda Gledhill

Press Secretary for Attorney General Kamala D. Harris

Law enforcement, public safety and key anti-gang operations are all at risk under the budget agreed to by Legislative Democrats and Governor Jerry Brown.

The cut of $71 million will wipe out the state’s Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement and the Bureau of Investigation and Intelligence and eliminate more than 55 statewide law enforcement task forces.  These agents and task forces are on the frontlines of the state’s struggle against sophisticated gangs and drug trafficking organizations.  The loss of these task forces, combined with the elimination of DOJ’s role in the state witness protection program, will dramatically undermine recent gains made against gangs in Los Angeles, the Bay Area, and the Central Valley.

Just weeks ago, the Department of Justice and local law enforcement partners arrested 101 gang leaders and members in the Central Valley.  They were members of a notorious prison-based gang with ties to foreign drug cartels, and this operation has crippled their grip on the drug trade flowing through the central part of the state.  The month before, we took down more than 30 members of a transnational gang operating in the Bay Area, seizing over 100 pounds of methamphetamine.

These are operations of statewide significance, which is why the California Police Chiefs Association is pleading for these task forces to be saved.  

But it’s not only gang enforcement that’s losing out.  This proposed cut will eliminate much of the California Mortgage Fraud Strike Force that our office recently launched.  The cut would eliminate nearly every one of the Strike Force’s investigators, cutting off pending investigations and potential cases designed to protect homeowners and hold bad actors in the mortgage industry accountable.  

The last Attorney General fought against these very same cuts.  It was the right decision then and has even more urgency now, as drug cartel and transnational gang activity in California is rising and our homeowners urgently need protection from predators in the mortgage market.  

The cuts should be undone and, at minimum, be unallocated so that the Department of Justice can make decisions on where to cut and how best protect the programs most critical to Californians.

Dear Friend,

Some things in life simply aren’t negotiable – like a high quality public education for our children.

My parents emigrated from China to San Francisco when I was three years old. San Francisco public schools gave me the foundation and opportunity to succeed in America. They did the same for all four of my children.

That’s why it’s so important that we stop the budget cuts to education being proposed in Sacramento right now. They will hurt our children, our families and our community.

Check out our first TV commercial of the campaign  – on our Facebook page or at LelandYee.com – and join with me and teachers from across California to put a stop to these unconscionable cuts to education.

In today’s tough economy, middle class families depend on high quality public education. It’s the backbone that has driven California’s economy to become one of the most dynamic in the world and made our state a land of opportunity.

Join our campaign and send a message today that some things aren’t negotiable – even in Sacramento. Our children, our families, our teachers and our communities deserve better. Join the fight to protect public education.

Sincerely,

Senator Leland Yee

Today, we launched the brand new LelandYee.com

There’s a lot at stake right now. Right wing extremists and their special interests want to balance the budget on the backs of our schools and our children. Simply put, I need your help to stop them.

I’m asking for you to visit our new site and sign up for our action alerts. Help us put a stop to these awful budget cuts.

The Governor’s budget proposal would be disastrous for our local schools – cutting over $12 million in direct classroom support. Coupled with other cuts, that’s nearly a $20 million loss for our local schools. That means larger classes, fewer books, older computers, fewer after school programs and less opportunity for our children.

Time is running out – with a potential budget vote likely to come later this week, we have only a few days to stop this.

On the new LelandYee.com, you can join thousands of teachers and parents in signing our petition to the Governor to stop these cuts.

I will not allow right wing extremists to cut public education funding to balance the budget.

I’ve always been a budget hawk. While on the Board of Supervisors in San Francisco, I established the largest “Rainy Day” fund in the city’s history. In Sacramento, I have called for more transparency in our arcane budgeting process.

However, I can’t in good conscience let these cuts happen.

I hope you will sign up and use the tools to help me stop these cuts that balance our budget on the backs of our children and our schools.

Sincerely,

Senator Leland Yee

PS – Make sure to visit the new LelandYee.com and tell us what you think on our Facebook page.

Today, Governor Schwarzenegger has come out with his revised state budget. It, quite predictably, calls for more massive program cuts, including the wholesale elimination of programs that serve the most vulnerable in the state. He refuses to even put on the table for discussion any tax increases or the development of other revenue sources. As always, the Republican legislators bob their heads as a block in agreement.

For those of us working in non-profits or the public sector in California, there are absolutely no surprises here. We’ve easily recognized Arnold and the Republican legislators’ agenda all along because it mirrors a national plan that is based on a cold, neoliberal, Darwinian philosophy.

We’ve perceived that the long-term goal all along has been to completely dismantle government and empower corporate America and the financial elite. These are the individuals who have, framed on the walls of their posh offices, the words of Grover Nordquist to “reduce government to the level where it can be drowned in a bathtub.”

Essentially, they want us to return to a feudal society, with a ruling elite and cowed masses worried about keeping their jobs, their homes, their chance at an education, their dwindling hopes for any improvement of their lives. They’ll continually utilize fear and anger to maintain their power. The only money spent will be on national defense, while they regularly stoke fears about terrorists or illegal immigrants (Viking raiders, Attila the Hun, displaced native tribes, your great-grandparents from Sweden, Italy and Ireland…or Mexico) in the peasants, while really using those armed forces to ensure their status quo at home. Ironically, much will be similar to the times when the monopoly British East India Company ruled the American colonies or when many western towns were company towns.

Arnold et. al. have been quietly laying this foundation for his entire term: to culminate in the privatization of all public services and destruction of government “by the people, for the people..” in favor of domination by corporations, their lobbyists and the elite. They’ve repeated the mantra that the private sector can always do so much better than the public sector. They’ve thrown out the whole concept of checks and balances in our system. They’ve rewritten history in terms of the “Founding Fathers,” who perceived the dangers of concentrated power in the private sector and in the merging of government with business (including mainstream media). They’ve conveniently ignored the blatant examples of how blind trust in, and lack of oversight over, the private sector always leads to disaster (Enron, bank failures, oil spills, Halliburton, corporate-sponsored initiatives). They claim concern for small businesses while their unchecked brand of rule trends that private sector towards uncompetitive, corporate monopolies in all sectors. They talk about democracy, while regularly seeking to undermine it and impose the will of a minority. They rail against big government, but enable big corporation in its place.

But for those of us who work in public schools, non-profit health agencies, state agencies, local fire and police departments, etc., the biggest conflict is their attitude that everything will be solved by an unfettered, free market and that everything should be addressed by “the wonders of the marketplace.” They worship competition and eschew cooperation. They feel everyone is motivated solely by material gain and deny, or have contempt for, those of us who believe in public service, in caring for others, in the common good, that we’re all in this together and that we need to cooperate in order to make better communities, a better state, a better world.

They are also, quite clearly, willing to bet the whole house (meaning the house serving the common good) on their battle plan because they won’t be the ones killed as the house is burned down. They’ll watch from their gated communities on the hillside, like the “Stratus Dwellers” in an old Star Trek episode, with their millions from tax breaks safely ensconced in overseas tax shelters.

As the past few years have indicated, Arnold and the Republicans will not even discuss any options that don’t fit with their philosophy. Never mind that their job, as elected officials, is to PUT ALL OPTIONS ON THE TABLE, especially in “crisis” times!!! They will stonewall to the point where the state is paralyzed or on the verge of collapse because they demand we take their way or the highway. They will cynically bet that the other side will always blink first, due to that side’s actually caring for the real people hurt by their drowning of government/enthrone the plutocracy strategy. After all, we’re the ones who see and feel the human costs of their death by a thousand cuts approach and we always want to minimize the pain. Of course, this slow-bleed of government achieves all of their goals in the end.

And here we are. We’re right where they’ve wanted us since the implementation of FDR’s New Deal, the rise of the middle class in the 1950’s, and the enactment of various civil rights legislation in the 1960’s.

California, since 1978, has been the test case for their destruction of that New Deal and its more egalitarian benefits, through the promotion of a neoliberal agenda at the state level. If they destroy safety nets, privatize social services, education, transportation, and more, and drown the last vestiges of state government, they will be emboldened to do so across the rest of the country. The end result will most certainly be states and a nation about as far from the ideals of a true democracy as you can imagine. It will be a complete failure of Gandhi’s test of a society being ultimately being judged by how it treats its most vulnerable.

The big question now is, are those of us who believe in another vision willing to make our stand? Even if it does cause a lot of short-term pain? Are those in Sacramento who truly believe in something besides a monopoly dominated “free” market/emasculated puppet government world willing to draw a line in the sand? Are we willing to go beyond rallies that are ignored, letters and petitions that are stuck with contempt in a back drawer, and raise the ante? Are we willing to fight for the most vulnerable who, quite literally, have nothing else to lose at this point and will suffer and die from this destruction of state government? Are we willing to get out of our special interest silos and work together for a society that values cooperation, the common good, and basic caring and that can function (as other countries have clearly shown) quite well with a vibrant free market economy, representative government, active non-government organizations, and independent media-each serving to keep the excesses of the other in check through constant vigilance and citizen participation?

I know I am because as one proud, “bleeding heart liberal,” (as they so like to label us) I’m sick to hell of this crap.



Glenn Reed, Eureka

UC Berkeley’s Center for Labor Research and Education recently analyzed the effect of proposed cuts in California’s largest health and human services programs. The results are staggering. Here are just some of them:

“Cutting in-home care services by $1 billion – reducing spending on the very old, the very young, the poor and the disabled is one of the perennial proposals to save state funds – would mean the loss of more than 215,000 full-time-equivalent jobs in the next year…For every dollar spent by the state government on in-home supportive services, we get $2.47 from the feds….Cutting in-home services by $1 billion (also) would result in an estimated loss of $359 million in state and local taxes, so the actual savings would be much less than projected….”

Other than an op-ed piece in the Chronicle on Sunday, unfortunately, no other media outlet has picked up on this important study. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/04/24/ING71D18D8.DTL

Isn’t it interesting that when a couple of Stanford graduate students recently released a study calling for the imminent collapse of the public employees’ pension system, the media were all over it like fleas on a hound.  But this report, which could affect the lives of millions of our most vulnerable citizens, goes unreported.

Another example of the media’s “liberal bias,” I guess.

Most everyone has heard the saying about the frog in the pot on the stove. The heat is raised ever so slowly that the frog doesn’t really notice.

Of course, the frog eventually dies in boiling water.

It’s similar to the Chinese “death by a thousand cuts,” or the term “creeping normalcy,” which refers to major changes that are accepted as normal when they happen slowly.

This all came to mind last week when I read that the local Easter Seals in Humboldt County is closing. Another small cut in our community life, partly due to state budget “trimming.” A few more area residents experiencing a diminishing of their quality of life.

I thought more about this when I went to do a swim work-out at the Arcata Pool. I was remembering my first two years going there on specific nights when patient, caring swimming instructors worked with developmentally disabled youth. They had a great time.

I realized that I hadn’t seen them there in a long time.

Later, while shopping at Wildberries, I noticed a table asking for donations to save HSU’s Natural History Museum. I looked across the street to the darkened windows of this facility that has been such an asset to the community and Humboldt County.

It’s closed now, except for special occasions. Quality of life. Community. Cuts.

Driving back to Eureka, I thought about a person I hadn’t seen at a work meeting that day. She’s always been an active asset to our community and was frequently seen around town.

In her electric wheelchair. She has a disability and she’s a senior. She couldn’t get out of bed that day because she can’t find an IHSS (In-Home Support Services) care provider. Now she’s worried because the Governor has proposed cutting that program altogether and that she might be forced into a nursing home.

Another disabled person I know, who lives in his own apartment thanks to the IHSS program, says he would prefer dying to ending up in a care facility. It’s a matter of quality of life. One more little cut. One more devastated life.

This made me ponder the phone message that I saved at work, from a woman in Orick who was despondent over further state cuts to her meager SSI.

She said that she’d been having to choose between heat and food over the last winter even before recent cuts. I thought of the blog comments I’d seen referring to “deadbeats” to “get a job.” I note the state’s unemployment rate, which will increase significantly if Arnold gets many of his cuts. I thought of the disabled acquaintance who wants to start working through Calworks, also proposed for elimination, and the number of local jobs not available to the disabled because the work sites are not accessible.

These people certainly notice that stove’s been turned up.

The next day a co-worker told me about an agency consumer with schizophrenia who had her prescribed meds eliminated due to MediCal cuts. She’s now in the hospital and not in her own apartment. Quality of life? Hardly. Not to mention a greater cost to the community.

Another degree or two or five on the stove.

I looked at the newspaper that day and read about Eureka City budget deficits and necessary cuts that are partly due to the state “borrowing” money from local governments. Sacramento won’t ask for an oil extraction fee, but your local taxes will subsidize those corporations’ right to a hefty profit.

Cut a policemen here, close a zoo there. Quality of life. Cuts.

I heard about a community in California that is now charging $300 for 9-1-1 calls. Pay up, or your life is forfeit. The commodification of CPR.

I read about 900 teaching positions being slashed in the Bay Area and of police and fire jobs being cut. I thought of protesters yelling about high taxes, but then complaining about the potholes in the road and the slow response by the police to their calls.

I talked to a friend who can’t afford to continue in college and heard someone complain that they took time off to take care of business at a state agency, only to find it closed that day.

Notes to the Eagles “Hotel California” played somewhere in my head, but Don Henley was singing “They’re killing them off at the Hotel California.  It’s so very clear, the common good is long gone here.”

Feel the temperature rising yet? Is the water tepid or just lukewarm? Is that just another paper cut on your finger?

Grover Nordquist once said of government that he would like to “get it down to the size where we can drown it in a bathtub.” Would he be referring to  government that’s for and by the people?

Grover would cheer the Golden State plan being enacted: golden for the chosen few and a rain (trickle down?) of fool’s gold for the rest.

I think of Arnold, with his budget cuts year after year after year. I hear E-Meg regurgitating “no taxes, more cuts, no taxes, more cuts” and signing a no tax pledge during the greatest recession since the Depression. Sure, let’s turn government into a business appendage and run it properly! Just like Enron and Exxon-Mobil and Bank of America, right?

I think of Republican legislators refusing to even discuss raising any taxes and cowed (majority?) Democrats forced to make “the hard decisions” of cutting the budget (just a few more cuts on the arms and legs; just a few degrees up on the stove, just ONE more time).

I think of the state’s citizens saying that just 500 cuts aren’t enough, but PLEASE don’t kill the patient–clinging to their “have our cake and eat it too” belief system while the cupboards are laid bare and the landlord laughs all the way to his barely taxed mansion. Oh no! Prop. 13 was ONLY about saving grandma’s little house in the neighborhood (wink, wink). We can’t EVER touch that!

So one more Easter Seals closes. One more senior becomes homeless. One more person can’t go to college. The death by a thousand cuts, creeping normalcy, frog in the pot–it’s all the same. Elimination of checks and balances, destruction of the common good and civil society, wiping out government “by the people,” reign by the unregulated chaos of free markets on steroids growing into corporate monopolies, and the entrenchment of a new aristocracy mouthing platitudes to the democracy that they’ve bought and sold out.

But…but…we want to save the poor frog, the people whisper. Then they turn away as the forces of corporate rule wielding their subsidiary government arm turn up the heat another notch. They never notice that it’s most all of us inside the pot.

And that many are already scalded. And that we’ll all soon join them.

(Welcome Sen. DeSaulnier – promoted by Brian Leubitz)

At the Contra Costa County United Democratic Campaign CD 10 candidates’ forum last week, the candidates were asked to list examples of when they had defied Democratic party leadership in order to stand up for progressive values and make real change.  I told the audience of Contra Costa Democratic activists that I had a history of doing so, and in fact might have to do so if the leadership put an all-cuts budget up for a vote this week in the Senate.  Yesterday, I kept my promise and did not vote for the all-cuts budget that was brought to the floor.

Progressive values and commonsense dictate that we have a budget that combines cuts with increases in revenue.  A cuts-only budget is a recipe for disaster in California and severely hurts the most vulnerable of our fellow Californians.  In an era of “yes we can,” the Governor and Republican legislators are telling Californians “no they can’t” have sensible solutions to California’s budget crisis.  They have pushed Democrats into a “through the looking glass” scenario where Democrats are on the record voting for $11 billion in cuts and Republicans are on the record voting against them, but there is no record that in fact the Republicans want even deeper cuts and refuse to support any tax increases whatsoever.  Only in Sacramento could such an Alice in Wonderland scenario unfold.

The truth is that standing up for progressive values sometimes dictates that we go against the decisions of our leadership.  I cannot in good conscience vote for a budget that does not include significant revenue increases.  In the next few days, we will have votes on raising revenue through an oil severance tax and an increase in the tobacco tax.  I will vote for those because proposals to increase revenue to the state must be part of any solution to California’s deficit.  

In addition, I joined with Senator Lois Wolk in writing the Legislative Analyst’s Office seeking advice on the most efficient way to close corporate tax loopholes in California.  There are approximately $50 billion – $50 billion! – in tax loopholes that exist right now.  

It’s time to push back hard against the ideological inflexibility of the Governor and the Republicans in the legislature and make them take responsibility in front of the voters for their efforts to drive California over a fiscal cliff.  There is no proposal that will create a budget that is pain free.  But an all-cuts budget is the most painful for the people who are the most vulnerable.

We can do better for California.  Yes, as progressives, we can stand up to make a bad budget better.  That was my promise to the Contra Costa Democrats last Friday and it’s my promise to you today.

Mark DeSaulnier