90 Years, How Quickly Meg Forgets

Hey do you vote?  Well, if you are reading this, the answer is probably yes.  And you would assume that pretty much anybody who was really interested in politics would have done so for pretty much every election.  Not so with Meg Whitman.  She’s less interested in such trivial matters when she can go ahead and just plunk another $104 million into the game.  

But, some really good people fought like hell to give her that right to vote that she has chosen to cast away.  So, a few groups have banded together to remind her of said fight, on the 90th Anniversary of the 19th Amendment

Whitman’s spotty voting record, of course, has been an issue in the gubernatorial campaign, and the candidate herself has called it “atrocious.” But the California Nurses Association, the Courage Campaign  and a host of labor groups intend to remind voters again, insisting they’ll deliver the largest and possibly most colorful anti-Whitman rally ever on the 90th anniversary of the day the 19th amendment was signed into law. …

The 4 p.m. rally near the Capitol steps will include folks in period costumes, historical characters, newsboys and Elizabth Jenkins-Sahlin, the great great grandaughter of the women’s rights pionner Elizabeth Cady Stanton,says CNA spokesman Chuck Idelson. (SFGate)

Should be fun for the whole family, don your best bonnet if you are in the neighborhood.

Bill Hedrick Calls Out Congressman Calvert’s Election Season Mailer Abuse

Democratic congressional candidate Bill Hedrick challenged Republican Congressman Ken Calvert (CA-44) to either end his planned egregious abuse of taxpayer-funded Congressional mailers during the weeks leading up to Election Day, or pay taxpayers back the tens of thousands of dollars in public funds it’ll cost us.

Local educators joined Hedrick at a campaign event at Riverside City Hall to challenge Calvert to reimburse taxpayers the minimum $35,000 his office will spend in taxpayer dollars – enough for an average starting salary for a teacher according to the National Education Association – or stop abusing his congressional franked mailing privileges until Election Day.

In a recent newspaper article, Calvert’s office signaled his plan to bill taxpayers at least $35,000 to send official Congressional mail to 100,000 households during election season, circumventing rules ensuring fair elections. Calvert said he’d run around rules banning mass mailings (500+ pieces) during election season by sending more than 200 variations of mailers at 499 apiece. According to House disbursement statements, Calvert’s average per mailer cost is 35 cents.

“The taxpayer-funded Wall Street bailout that Congressman Calvert voted for does not extend to taxpayers bailing out his campaign,” Hedrick said to about 30 educators and supporters at the event. “Local taxpayers would much rather have this money spent on local needs, like keeping teachers employed.”

The National Education Association pegs $35,000 as the average starting salary for teachers. Speaking with Hedrick were California Teachers Association board member Mikki Cichocki and Kristy Orona-Ramirez, a laid off teacher from Riverside who spoke about the challenges she and her family face during these economic times.

The World Looooves Carly Fiorina!

After all, why wouldn’t they? She sends American jobs overseas with regularity.  Year after year, Carly Fiorina sent jobs from HP’s American facilities to new facilities in low wage countries. Oh, and then she was fired for being one of the worst CEO’s in history.

So, now she’s running around the state complaining about the high unemployment rate. And even setting up a website calling Boxer the Failed Senator.

Well, Karl Rove did always say attack at your weekness, and guess what, failure is Carly Fiorina’s persistent weakness. She failed at HP, and then was shoved out the door, and now she wants to bring all that failure with her to DC. And remove what was left of the middle class in California and the nation.

Remind me again why she is qualified for this job?

Struggling to Educate Our State

Following up on Michael O’Hare’s essay from yesterday, today we get the very real consequences of what we have become.  We no longer pay to educate our students:

California’s top fiscal officials Monday ordered the deferral of $2.5 billion in payments to the state’s public schools next month to conserve cash and stave off the need to begin issuing IOUs.

The state’s budget is 54 days late, and that delay has stretched the state’s depleted treasury to the breaking point. Issuance of scrip could come within weeks.

The deferral announced Monday “was not taken lightly,” state Controller John Chiang, Treasurer Bill Lockyer and Department of Finance Director Ana Matosantos wrote in a joint letter to the Legislature. (LAT)

Sure, the schools had notice that this was coming down the pike, and they will be able to get loans to cover them in the short term until the budget is passed.  But that’s not really the point is it?  

Once again, we allow ourselves to be at the whim of the credit markets, and are paying interest where none should be paid. We spend a lesser share of our GDP on state funding today than we did 30 years ago, and we spend a lesser share of that smaller pie to educate our students.

And if the neo-liberal takeover wasn’t well and truly complete, we have the fact that financial institutions are the ones that benefit from this little delay.  Hardly the biggest moneymaker ever for them, but when this is all said and done, some very real money will come out of classrooms and land in the pockets of Wall Street.

The fight is worth fighting, we simply cannot continue to cede further ground every year.  This isn’t a matter of not being able to afford our services, it is a matter of not wanting to pay for our services.

At one point, there was an ideal for California as the place where people could go to dream big dreams, and climb up the ladder.  The ladder is now just being pulled up faster than people can attempt to move up. If we are to move forward, we must fight just as hard in order to push the ladder back down and facilitate education, and development in the state.

That doesn’t mean a slavish devotion to jobs at any cost.  If we are giving Californians the option of a McJob or nothing, we are not really helping anybody, and we have failed.  We need real jobs, with real pay that can support a middle class lifestyle.  That is why Jerry Brown’s plans are simply far more appealing than Whitman’s plans for forced austerity, and the slashing of 40,000 jobs. It is neither possible nor positive.

And it is just one more reason that we have to ensure that we elect Democrats throughout the state this year. The alternative is just too horrifying.

Hunger Strike Day 11: Candidate Lutz claims victory, breaks fast today

NEWS RELEASE

Ray Lutz for Congress 2010

www.VoteRayLutz.com

Media Contact: Brennan Purtzer, Media Director 619-447-3246 / [email protected]

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Hunger Strike Day 11: Candidate Lutz claims victory, breaks fast today

Lutz announces new national organization to carry on efforts

San Diego County, Calif. (August 23, 2010) – After 11 days of fasting, Congressional Candidate Ray Lutz has announced that with the founding of a new national organization (Debate for Democracy) to carry on the fight for congressional debates, he will finally agree to eat something.

“Now that I know the fight for debates will continue, I feel it’s time to have a bite,” Lutz said.

Lutz, whose fast lasted longer than Gandhi’s 1932 starvation, ate his first regular meal just after 2 p.m. on Monday, at Pat & Oscar’s restaurant in El Cajon. He had been phasing himself back into nourishment with some vegetable broth and a bit of fruit over the weekend.

Lutz’s new, non-partisan organization, DebateforDemocracy.org was founded after Lutz encountered other congressional challengers who faced incumbents who were also hesitant to engage in formal debates.

“I just made a few phone calls, and immediately realized this was a national problem,” Lutz said. “Congressman Hunter isn’t the only incumbent ducking debates. But he might be the only combat veteran afraid to face his opponent.”

On DebateforDemocracy.org, citizens, candidates and incumbents alike are invited to sign a pledge to support debates in their districts and if they are candidates, to debate their opponents an adequate number of times in locations that ensure most of their constituents will have the opportunity to attend and present questions. Already there are Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, and Greens as who have taken the pledge. The organization will research options for promoting debates in every district in the country, using the bright shining light of public review, involving the creation of a Commission on Congressional Debates (CCD), or perhaps enhancing the role of the Federal Election Commission.

Rick Tubbs, Republican challenger in California’s 7th Congressional District and a Debate for Democracy pledge-taker, said “Debates between candidates are the best way to inform the voters about where those trying to represent them stand on the issues. There is no big money involved, just the candidates standing on their own making their case to the voter.”

“Election debates are a traditional part of the American process, they go all the way back to Lincoln,” said Lutz. “It’s an effective way to help voters see where there candidates stand on this issues – and that strengthens our republic.”

The Lutz for Congress campaign would like to advise anyone who wants to “Hunger Strike” to lose weight to make sure they consult with their doctor and be very careful how they end the fast. Complete abstinence from food can be dangerous.

For more information on Ray Lutz for Congress, visit:http://www.VoteRayLutz.com/

For media inquiries, contact Brennan Purtzer, media coordinator, at 619.447.3246

A Promise Broken…What Anti-Tax Rhetoric Has Wrought

 A few years ago, I was fortunate enough to graduate from Berkeley's Goldman School of Public Policy.  While there, I had the opportunity to meet Michael O'Hare, a professor there.  To put it simply, he was a fantastic teacher, somebody who could break down complicated ideas into digestible nuggets.

 And while it is nigh impossible to explain the actions of the budget since about 1975, he did about the best I've seen in quite a while.  And I've seen quite a few people try to do this.  In short, he explains that the Baby Boomer Generation, when they got into power, decided to pull up the ladder for those coming behind them.  They were the recipients of the largesse of a well-planned and financed government, lead by Governor Pat Brown's committment to both education and infrastructure.  But rather than mutilating his argument, I'll let him explain it. (Full version over the flip or at the always interesting Reality Based Community.)

The bad news is that you have been the victims of a terrible swindle, denied an inheritance you deserve by contract and by your merits.  And you aren’t the only ones; victims of this ripoff include the students who were on your left and on your right in high school but didn’t get into Cal, a whole generation stiffed by mine.  This letter is an apology, and more usefully, perhaps a signal to start demanding what’s been taken from you so you can pass it on with interest.

 

Swindle–what happened? Well, before you were born, Californians now dead or in nursing homes made a remarkable deal with the future.  (Not from California? Keep reading, lots of this applies to you, with variations.) They agreed to invest money they could have spent on bigger houses, vacations, clothes, and cars into the world’s greatest educational system, and into building and operating water systems, roads, parks, and other public facilities, an infrastructure that was the envy of the world. They didn’t get everything right: too much highway and not enough public transportation. But they did a pretty good job. …

This deal held until about thirty years ago, when for a variety of reasons, California voters realized that while they had done very well from the existing contract, they could do even better by walking away from their obligations and spending what they had inherited on themselves.  “My kids are finished with school; why should I pay taxes for someone else’s?  Posterity never did anything for me!”  An army of fake ‘leaders’ sprang up to pull the moral and fiscal wool over their eyes, and again and again, your parents and their parents lashed out at government (as though there were something else that could replace it) with tax limits, term limits, safe districts, throw-away-the-key imprisonment no matter the cost, smoke-and-mirrors budgeting, and a rule never to use the words taxes and services in the same paragraph. (Reality based community)

 The turning point, of course, was Prop 13, but it was more gradual than the simple passage of Prop 13.  There was a movement built on the entire purpose of keeping the wealth held tight within one generation, locking in the static state of who was wealthy and who was not.  Our universities, still a factory for the American dream, were defunded as somebody else's problem.

it is dangerously short term thinking, but the appeal is immediately obvious.  Keep more of your paycheck, Yay! But, if we aren't building for tomorrow's economy, then who exactly will be there to pick up the slack for the next generation.  This is now the primary battle. Greater than taxes vs. services, corporations vs. unions, it is a matter of short-term cash vs. long-term investment.

And right now, the state is heading down the dangerous road of a financial hedonism that indulges the primacy of self-interest. There is no question that the ramifications have been horrific.  The only question left to answer is whether we can recover.

Welcome to Berkeley, probably still the best public university in the world. Meet your classmates, the best group of partners you can find anywhere.  The percentages for grades on exams, papers, etc. in my courses always add up to 110% because that’s what I’ve learned to expect from you, over twenty years in the best job in the world.

That’s the good news.  The bad news is that you have been the victims of a terrible swindle, denied an inheritance you deserve by contract and by your merits.  And you aren’t the only ones; victims of this ripoff include the students who were on your left and on your right in high school but didn’t get into Cal, a whole generation stiffed by mine.  This letter is an apology, and more usefully, perhaps a signal to start demanding what’s been taken from you so you can pass it on with interest.

Swindle–what happened? Well, before you were born, Californians now dead or in nursing homes made a remarkable deal with the future.  (Not from California? Keep reading, lots of this applies to you, with variations.) They agreed to invest money they could have spent on bigger houses, vacations, clothes, and cars into the world’s greatest educational system, and into building and operating water systems, roads, parks, and other public facilities, an infrastructure that was the envy of the world. They didn’t get everything right: too much highway and not enough public transportation. But they did a pretty good job.

Young people who enjoyed these ‘loans’ grew up smarter, healthier, and richer than they otherwise would have, and understood that they were supposed to “pay it forward” to future generations, for example by keeping the educational system staffed with lots of dedicated, well-trained teachers, in good buildings and in small classes, with college counselors and up-to-date books.  California schools had physical education, art for everyone, music and theater, buildings that looked as though people cared about them, modern languages and ancient languages, advanced science courses with labs where the equipment worked, and more. They were the envy of the world, and they paid off better than Microsoft stock. Same with our parks, coastal zone protection, and social services.

This deal held until about thirty years ago, when for a variety of reasons, California voters realized that while they had done very well from the existing contract, they could do even better by walking away from their obligations and spending what they had inherited on themselves.  “My kids are finished with school; why should I pay taxes for someone else’s?  Posterity never did anything for me!”  An army of fake ‘leaders’ sprang up to pull the moral and fiscal wool over their eyes, and again and again, your parents and their parents lashed out at government (as though there were something else that could replace it) with tax limits, term limits, safe districts, throw-away-the-key imprisonment no matter the cost, smoke-and-mirrors budgeting, and a rule never to use the words taxes and services in the same paragraph.

Now, your infrastructure is falling to pieces under your feet, and as citizens you are responsible for crudities like closing parks, and inhumanities like closing battered women’s shelters. It’s outrageous, inexcusable, that you can’t get into the courses you need, but much worse that Oakland police have stopped taking 911 calls for burglaries and runaway children. If you read what your elected officials say about the state today, you’ll see things like “California can’t afford” this or that basic government function, and that “we need to make hard choices” to shut down one or another public service, or starve it even more (like your university). Can’t afford? The budget deficit that’s paralyzing Sacramento is about $500 per person; add another $500 to get back to a public sector we don’t have to be ashamed of, and our average income is almost forty times that.  Of course we can afford a government that actually works: the fact is that your parents have simply chosen not to have it.

I’m writing this to you because you are the victims of this enormous cheat (though your children will be even worse off if you don’t take charge of this ship and steer it). Your education was trashed as California fell to the bottom of US states in school spending, and the art classes, AP courses, physical education, working toilets, and teaching generally went by the board. Every year I come upon more and more of you who have obviously never had the chance to learn to write plain, clear, English.  Every year, fewer and fewer of you read newspapers, speak a foreign language, understand the basics of how government and business actually work, or have the energy to push back intellectually against me or against each other. Or know enough about history, literature, and science to do it effectively!  You spent your school years with teachers paid less and less, trained worse and worse, loaded up with more and more mindless administrative duties, and given less and less real support from administrators and staff.

Many of your parents took a hike as well, somehow getting the idea that the schools had taken over their duties to keep you learning, or so beat-up working two jobs each and commuting two hours a day to put food on the table that they couldn’t be there for you. A quarter of your classmates didn’t finish high school, discouraged and defeated; but they didn’t leave the planet, even if you don’t run into them in the gated community you will be tempted to hide out in.  They have to eat just like you, and they aren’t equipped to do their share of the work, so you will have to support them.

You need to have a very tough talk with your parents, who are still voting; you can’t save your children by yourselves.  Equally important, you need to start talking to each other.  It’s not fair, and you have every reason (except a good one) to keep what you can for yourselves with another couple of decades of mean-spirited tax-cutting and public sector decline. You’re my heroes just for surviving what we put you through and making it into my classroom, but I’m asking for more: you can be better than my generation. Take back your state for your kids and start the contract again.  There are lots of places you can start, for example, building a transportation system that won’t enslave you for two decades as their chauffeur, instead of raising fares and cutting routes in a deadly helix of mediocrity.  Lots. Get to work.  See you in class!

UPDATE: Like your political science in musical form? Here’s the way people thought about this stuff back in the day, and maybe should again. Bet there’s a good rap along these lines waiting to be born…

Whitman-Samueli Fundraiser Raises Questions

As millions of Californians continue to struggle in this economy, Meg Whitman will spend her evening today collecting huge checks from corporate insiders at the posh Corona Del Mar mansion of fellow billionaire CEO Henry Samueli.

Of course, there’s nothing unusual about candidates holding fundraisers, even billionaires like Whitman. But there’s more to meets the eye with this particular fundraiser considering the host’s background. And there’s some serious questions that need to be raised about whom exactly would have Whitman’s ear if she were to be elected governor.

Among the most burning questions raised in relation to tonight’s Whitman-Samueli cash bonanza is: Why would Whitman draw herself further into the web of corporate greed and corruption epitomized by Broadcom, the company Samueli led until forced out amidst the nation’s largest stock backdating scandal?

California Labor Federation Executive Secretary-Treasurer Art Pulaski:

Meg Whitman’s decision to hold a high-dollar fundraiser with another billionaire CEO whose questionable practices have drawn the attention of federal investigators is both troubling and illuminating. It’s clear that Whitman is growing bolder in her shameless attempt to buy this election. The fact that she would consort with controversial corporate figures like Samueli to fatten her already bloated war chest shows a serious lapse in judgment.

While many corporate insiders are aware of Broadcom’s troubles, Samueli’s past isn’t on the radar of most Californians. But given Whitman’s close ties to him and other corporate CEOs, it probably should be.

A look under the surface shows Whitman and Samueli have more in common than being billionaire CEOs. Both were corporate insiders whose companies were involved in questionable insider deals that made millions for executives at the expense of shareholders. Both Whitman and Samueli’s companies have been targets of federal investigations into the very same kind of shady Wall Street dealings that drove the economy into meltdown.  

Samueli’s Broadcom was involved in the nation’s largest stock backdating scandal after it failed to disclose to investors that the company had reset the dates of company stock grants to executives in order to artificially boost profits. Broadcom’s backdating scheme resulted an SEC investigation, Samueli’s ouster, and Broadcom eventually paid $160.5 million in investor settlements. Samueli pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators before, in an unusual move, a judge threw out the guilty plea. Samueli returned to Broadcom earlier this year as chief technology officer.

Of course, Whitman is no stranger to corporate scandals. Back in 2001, she was a Goldman Sachs board member who was directly involved in the decisions about executive bonuses and mortgage-backed securities that are now cited as major causes of the economic meltdown and the ensuing jobs crisis. Whitman pocketed almost $ 2 million by “spinning” sweetheart stock deals she scored as a reward for bringing Goldman lucrative investment banking contracts, a practice that soon became illegal.

Whitman resigned from the board after a Congressional probe into spinning but Goldman is still dealing with the aftermath of SEC investigations into the company’s shady dealings and recently coughed up more than $500 million to satisfy the charges.

It’s pretty easy to imagine the enormous influence corporate types like Samueli would have in a Whitman administration. It’s also deeply troubling that it’s that very type of influence Wall Street had with George W. Bush, and we all know the end to that story. If we’ve learned anything from the economic meltdown caused by Wall Street’s greed, it’s that when corporate insiders get too close to government power, working people pay the price.

Pulaski:

The last thing California’s working families need is more of the same corporate greed and corruption that destroyed our economy. Cozying up to corporate insiders in order to get elected shows that Whitman remains tone-deaf to the growing concerns voters have about her Wall Street ties and agenda.

Paid for by the California Labor Federation. Not authorized by a candidate or committee controlled by a candidate.

On the CRP Convo…and Me

Unfortunately, I was unable to make it to the California Republican Party convention this weekend in San Diego. I’m sure it was a blast for all involved.  The conservative, the right-wingers, the Tea partiers, and the over the top offensively backward.  A raucous good time, I’m sure.

Fortunately, the good folks at CalBuzz were able to make it.  I suggest you go read their 10 insights, but I’ll just pull out one, perhaps off-hand comment:

The convention’s biggest surprise came when a thickly muscled bouncer demanded that your Calbuzz correspondents (combined age: 122) produce I.D. to gain admittance to some second-rate pizza-joint-with-a-full-bar in the Gaslamp Quarter which they stumbled upon in the pre-dawn hours. The move by Thor (not his real name) reflected not only his apparent legal blindness, but also some CYA concerns he clearly felt in noting we were two decades younger than the average GOP convention worthy swarming the streets.

Of course, California Democrats have the same issue.  The party infrastructures of both parties are dismissive of the youth, and vice versa.  Of course, it comes down to a chicken and the egg type situation at some point, but if California is to become a truly 21st Century state, we need more young leaders willing to get involved in all segments of the state’s politics.

I suppose that I should mention here that I was just elected as the regional director of the state Democratic party for San Francisco and the northern half of San Mateo county.  So, I suppose I’ll say not just to my fellow Democrats, but to those of all political persuasions, that the way we make change is to get involved.  We must insist that California plans for the long-term instead of playing games with the present.

Democrats have a leg up in this area.  Young voters are overwhelmingly Democratic voters, but we must make sure that this stays true, and the so-called “millenials” continue to stay engaged beyond a one-off election.  Sure, it will be good for Democrats, but it will also be good for (small-d) democracy.

Prop 23: California’s Future Fights Back Against Oil Money

This fall, California voters will vote on Proposition 23, officially termed a “suspension” of California's global warming law (AB32) “until unemployment reaches 5.5%” and named by its supporters a “jobs initiative.”  

The battle should play out exactly as similar battles over federal climate policies: conservatives claim it'll destroy jobs, raise taxes, and increase family energy costs; environmentalists valiantly-yet-unsuccessfully try to set the record straight, only to be ignored by middle class voters worried about pocketbook issues.

But a funny thing is happening.

The narrative is shaping up to be quite different.  The shadowy interests behind Prop 23 are being exposed to the light.  And Prop 23 is being opposed by clean technology investors who see a stark choice: build the future or burn the planet.

Consider it evidence of hope.

In 2006, California passed the California Global Warming Solutions Act, commonly known as AB32, which established the first-in-the-world comprehensive program of regulatory and market mechanisms to achieve real, quantifiable, cost-effective reductions of greenhouse gases. Conservatives have been whining about it ever since it passed; hence, Proposition 23.  Officially, it's been placed on the ballot by Assemblymember Dan Logue, who calls it a “jobs initiative.”  But calling it a jobs initiative doesn't make it true, and calling it Logue's proposition only conceals the out of state dirty energy interests behind Proposition 23.

  1.  Behind Proposition 23: Out-of-State Oil and Coal

Who's really paying for Prop 23? Short answer: Valero Energy of Texas, Tesoro of Texas, and Koch Industries of oil/gas/coal/Americans for Prosperity fame.  

Valero has given over $4 million of the nearly $6.2 million received by the Yes on 23 campaign, and Tesoro is in for $525,000.  A shadowy Missouri conservative group with ties to coal whose spokesman criticizes “liberal politicians” in California with “crazy radical ideas” has donated $500,000, even though last December it only had $109 in its bank account.  A ThinkProgress blog post links Koch Industries to the “yes on Prop 23” forces.

A Sunlight Foundation investigation of donations 1998-2008 found that Big Oil's money at the state level goes mostly to influence public, not politicians; money is spent on elections, not contributions.  Prop 23 fits that mold.

  1.  Opposing Proposition 23: The Future

ca-print-map-lgOf course, environmentalists are appalled by any effort to roll back AB32.  However, serious money is coming from other sources.  Venture capitalist John Doerr has given $500,000 to the “No” campaign; Farallon founder Tom Steyer has pledged $5 million. Silicon Valley venture capitalist Vinod Khosla states: “Proposition 23 will kill markets and the single largest source of job growth in California in the last two years.  Not only that, it'll kill investment in the long term for creating the next 10 Googles.”  Small wonder that the cleantech industry opposes Prop 23.

In 2009, 40 percent of cleantech venture capital went to California, where some 12,000 companies are working on ways that could help businesses and consumers reduce energy consumption. More than 500,000 people work in the industry, including 93,000 in manufacturing and 68,000 in construction. Clean energy jobs are growing in California at 10 times the statewide average.  For job-related reasons, the San Jose Mercury News editorial page urges a no vote.

Big Oil may be meeting its match in Google.

Perhaps sensing a loser, Meg Whitman is waffling on Prop 23.

The fall campaign season hasn't yet started, and optimism may be premature.  However, a Proposition 23 defeat would be the first sign of optimism on the climate front I've seen since the climate bill died.  The good clean energy jobs are already here in California.  Investors know it.  Our economy will not only survive regulation of greenhouse gases, it'll flourish.  Let's hope the climate peacocks of the United States Senate listen.  In the meantime, courtesy of Climate Progress, here's five actions to take:

1.Visit the “No on 23″ website, learn the facts & sign up:  Stop Dirty Energy

2.Educate yourself on how California’s climate & energy laws have created companies & jobs: CABrightSpot

3.Tell your friends by email, on Facebook, at work, & everywhere else.

4.Participate in the debate. Write letters to the editor and post comments on blogs & websites.

5.Contribute here. The other side’s leader, right-wing California Assemblyman Dan Logue, has publicly said he expects the oil companies to spend $50 million.