All posts by Lucas O'Connor

Blackwater is Back and Badder Than Ever

Full disclosure: I work for the Courage Campaign

Cross posted at the Courage Campaign blog

Just when we thought we had won, Blackwater snuck in the back door and set up shop in San Diego with hardly anyone noticing.  Citizen Oversight Projects started spreading the word today that Blackwater will be opening a 61,600 square foot training facility in Otay Mesa, just a block from the U.S./Mexico border.  It’s also about 4 miles from the Otay Mesa border crossing and about 6.5 miles from the San Ysidro border crossing.  This is an indoor facility and obviously much smaller than the 824-acre project Blackwater had pursued in Potrero, but no less nefarious.

This comes at a time when national legislation to block Blackwater and other mercenaries is gaining steam.  And perhaps this incident demonstrates that without a major shift at the federal level, we’ll just be chasing Blackwater around in macabre version of whack-a-mole into eternity.

Ray Lutz, one of the key figures in the defeat of Blackwater in Potrero, visited the new site and reported back with pictures, impressions and particular points of concern.  He notes 20 truck bays and its position not only near two major border crossings but also the Tijuana International Airport.  And if there’s any doubt about the facility being used to train more mercenaries (and pretty clearly in the art of desert AND border tactics), note the word from Kelly Broughton, director of the city of San Diego’s development services department:

Broughton said the building was already permitted for use as a vocational trade school, and Blackwater’s training activities would fall within that category.

Vocational trade school. That’s what we’re calling it. If ITT Tech and a career in medical transcription isn’t for you, check out Blackwater West. However, I don’t think I’d have the same concerns about a bunch of crazy dental-assistants-in-training being planted within four miles of five schools (including three elementary schools) as I do about mercenaries.

The new facility is within the City of San Diego proper, which means that city regulations- not just county regulations- are potentially at play.  And that, of course, brings into the mix a number of political figures who might actually be moved on this issue.  The site of the facility is in the 8th District represented by Councilmember Ben Hueso. The City Council President is Scott Peters who is termed out and in the middle of a contentious race for City Attorney.  Councilmember Brian Maienschein is also termed out and running for City Attorney.  Mayor Jerry Sanders has a heckuva battle brewing for re-election against Steve Francis [name corrected], a Republican dressing himself in progressive clothing to run from both directions.  And that’s before we (potentially) get Donna Frye agitated.

At this point though, the permit has already been applied for and granted (more than a month ago).  Which means that opportunities for local recourse is likely limited unless and until something can be placed on the ballot.  That is, what worked last time (wildly successful recall) is unlikely to be at play this time.  What’s particularly interesting about this process though is that Blackwater submitted its application for this Otay Mesa facility in February but didn’t pull out of Potrero until March 9.  So, at least in principle, it was after both spots at the same time.  Or, more likely, it knew that the ship had sailed on Potrero weeks before actually pulling out, and dragged the process along in order to distract from its move on Otay Mesa.

The history of Blackwater and government-funded mercenaries doesn’t need a full rehash here, we know the score.  What we’re getting here are better trained, federally funded Minutemen living in the shadow of the border fence and a couple minutes from the busiest land border crossing in the world. They’re here to operate with impunity outside of the government doing the things this administration wishes it could be doing itself.  And it won’t stop unless and until we get the sort of systemic changes that can only come from the federal level.  This battle of local citizens vs. the mercenaries funded by our own tax dollars isn’t sustainable. Local action won in Potrero but here we are again.  We’ll mount up and take the fight to them again, but real change won’t happen until this country dumps Blackwater and those like it once and for all.

History by Jeff Denham

Disclosure: I work for the Courage Campaign

Cross posted at Courage Campaign

Jeff Denham’s first tv ad is up and running, and it’s striking a familiar “how dare you” tone, but mixing in a new bit of “you want me on that wall, you NEED me on that wall.”  Via Capitol Alert, is the transcript as delivered by former Secretary of State Bill Jones:

The recall was launched against Sen. Jeff Denham for one reason only.

He refused to vote for a budget billions out of balance. But then the non-partisan Legislative Analyst proved him right, forecasting an additional $10 billion in red ink.

Local newspapers label this recall an “Abuse of the ballot box.” (The Monterey County Herald 2/17/2008)

— a “sham.” (The Madera Tribune, 3/21/2008)

“Petty politics” (Hollister Freelance 2/19/2008)

And “Unjustified” (Fresno Bee 3/20/2008)

Saying this recall is “Just plain wrong.” (Merced Sun-Star 2/11/2008)

I agree. Vote No on the Recall.

At some point between last fall and now, Denham and Republicans forcing their budgetary priorities on the Democratic majority has turned into Republicans standing strong in the face of fiscal irresponsibility. At least in Jeff Denham’s head.  If Denham really wants to hold himself up as a paragon of budgetary virtue, he might need to answer a few questions.  Like why he keeps accepting pay raises even though he proudly/loudly opposes them.  He also better start coming up with an actual defense for why he stood in lockstep with his GOP brethren in sacrifice of his (supposed) legislative priorities:

As proposed, this budget contains much of what Denham wants, including full funding of education. He has been a strong advocate for schools, a position that has found favor with the powerful teachers union and with parents. It also has contributed to his reputation as a reasonable moderate and helped him win easy re-election last fall.

The Assembly and Senate Democrats have agreed to the spending plan, as has Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican. The holdup – and holdouts – are the Senate Republicans, including Denham.

That’s right- once upon a time Jeff Denham was a champion of education.  Then somewhere along the way he gave up serving the people of his district in favor of party loyalty.  And since the revenue cuts forced last year by Republicans have turned into pink slips for teachers this year, it’s a pretty stark contrast of priorities.  What could have inspired such a swing? The same article has a theory:

Because of term limits, he cannot run again for the Senate. He has filed the paperwork to run for lieutenant governor in 2010. It appears he is sticking with his hard-line GOP colleagues in order to curry favor with stalwart Republicans whose approval would be essential in his quest to win his party’s nomination for statewide office.

Party over the people.  It’s not surprising news from the same folks that birthed the Yacht Party of course, but somehow it’s still mindboggling.  Granted it’s delusional, but at least the new ad is a half-step away from hollow righteous indignation.  Unfortunately, Denham still can’t seem to shake this lame and worthless “I don’t deserve it” crap.  If Senator Denham doesn’t like being held up as the poster child for Republican legislative failures, he might have wanted to consider not personifying them.

Denham Doesn’t Like Being Picked On

The recall war is continuing to deliver drama, with Senator Denham dropping a radio ad a few days ago which implicitly suggests that he shouldn’t even be eligible for recall.  As Capitol Alert recounts, “The ad…says: ‘When a public official is guilty of malfeasance or criminal conduct in office, the California Constitution provides for the right to recall.'”

But as Capitol alert and Don Perata’s spokesman both note, that’s just one reason for someone to be recalled.  CapAlert was good enough to track down the applicable portion of the law, which says: “Recall of a state officer is initiated by delivering to the Secretary of State a petition alleging reason for recall. Sufficiency of reason is not reviewable.”

I don’t recall any conduct by Gray Davis that was either criminal or contrary to law, but I guess that could be in the eye of the beholder. You may recall (ha!) that the petitions circulated back in 2003 said in part:

[Governor Davis’s actions were a] “gross mismanagement of California Finances by overspending taxpayers’ money, threatening public safety by cutting funds to local governments, failing to account for the exorbitant cost of the energy, and failing in general to deal with the state’s major problems until they get to the crisis stage.”

Now, Senator Denham may not personally or at least exclusively be responsible for “gross mismanagement” of anything, but last I checked, our current budget crisis (which is based on the budget that Denham’s obstinacy helped create) is cutting funds to local governments (which threatens local education if not safety), has failed to account for the exorbitant cost of energy, and rather obviously failed in general to deal with the state’s major problems before they got to the crisis stage.  So basically, the one example of a major and modern recall election fits exactly with the premise driving the Denham recall attempt.  But rather than actually defend himself, Denham has decided to to whine about being picked on.

It might be that there’s a reasonable case for Denham to make on this, but he sure isn’t making it with this “why is everybody always picking on me?” silliness.

Darrell Issa Hates 9/11 Heroes, Who Loves Darrell Issa’s Money?

Cross posted at DailyKos and OpenLeft

So as we’ve established by now, Darrell Issa thinks very little of 9/11 rescue workers and would prefer that the federal government not concern itself with their welfare.  Cause according to him, 9/11 is not and presumably was not a national issue.  We’ve also established that he has no qualms about throwing federal money around on local pork as long as it benefits him directly.  So the next logical question for me is “oh hey, are there any familiar names that don’t mind taking Darrell Issa’s money?”  As you may or may not know, Darrell Issa is filthy rich.  So he’s spread a lot of money around on Republicans and conservative causes.  So as it turns out, there are quite a lot of Republicans currently running around the Capitol funded in part by Darrell Issa (partial list):


Dean Andal (candidate, CA-11)

Rep. Michele Bachmann (MN-06)

Rep. Brian Bilbray (CA-50)

Rep. Gus Bilirakis (FL-09)

Rep. Charles Boustany (LA-07)

Sen. Richard Burr (North Carolina)

Rep. John Campbell (CA-48)

Rep. Shelley Moore Captio (WV-02)

Rep. Steve Chabot (OH-01)

Rep. Tom Cole (OK-04) [head of NRCC]

Rep. Geoff Davis (KY-04)

Rep. John Doolitte (Retiring, CA-04)

Rep. Thelma Drake (VA-02)

Rep. Tom Feeney (FL-24)

Rep. Mike Ferguson (Retiring, NJ-07)

Rep. Randy Forbes (VA-04)

Rep. Jeff Fortenberry (NE-01)

Rep. Jim Gerlach (PA-06)

Rep. Phil Gingrey (GA-11)

Rep. Robin Hayes (NC-08)

Rep. Ric Keller (FL-08)

Rep. Mark Kirk (IL-10)

Rep. John Kline (MN-02)

Rep. Joe Knollenberg (MI-09)

Rep. Randy Kuhl (NY-29)

Rep. Doug Lamborn (CO-05)

Rep. Tom Latham (IA-04)

Rep. Bob Latta (OH-05)

Fmr. Rep. Cynthia McKinney (What the hell? ha.)

Rep. Candice Miller (MI-10)

Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (CO-04)

Rep. Randy Neugebauer (TX-19)

Fmr. Rep. Anne Northup (Candidate, KY-03)

Rep. Steve Pearce (Retiring, NM-02; Candidate, NM-SEN)

Rep. Mike Pence (IN-06)

Rep. Ted Poe (TX-02)

Rep. Jon Porter (NV-03)

Rep. Deborah Pryce (Retiring, OH-15)

Rep. Dennis Rehberg (MT-AL)

Rep. Dave Reichert (WA-08)

Rep. Rick Renzi (Retiring [to prison?], AZ-01)

Rep. Mike D. Rogers (AL-03)

Rep. Mike J. Rogers (MI-08)

Rep. Peter Roskam (IL-06)

Fmr. Rep. Jim Ryun (Candidate, KS-02)

Rep. Jean Schmidt (OH-02)

Shelley Sekula-Gibbs (Candidate, TX-22)

Rep. Pete Sessions (TX-32)

Rep. Chris Shays (CT-04)

Rep. John Shimkus (IL-19)

Fmr. Rep. Mike Sodrel (Candidate, IN-09)

Sen. John Sununu (New Hampshire)

Fmr. Rep. Pat Toomey (President, Club for Growth)

Rep. Jim Walsh (Retiring, NY-25)

Rep. Heather Wilson (Retiring, NM-01; Candidate, NM-SEN)

Rep. Rob Wittman (VA-01)

More than 50, and there are a lot of familiar names in there. Swing districts, notorious wingnuts, Senators in tough races.  How many of those people agree with Darrell Issa that the welfare of the heroes of 9/11 are no business of the United States government?  How many of them really want to be forced to answer such questions?  Rep. Issa has, for a number of years, been a bit of a hero in GOP fundraising circles.  Do people really want to be associated with his money now? Presumably the answer is “yes” in private and “maybe” in public.  If it’s even slightly possible to isolate Issa and his money, in this of all election cycles when the NRCC is desperately poor, it’s worth the effort.  Isn’t it time we start finding out how these politicians feel about taking money from just a soulless jerk?

Darrell Issa has a Better Idea

Hammering on this a lot, but it just keeps getting more ridiculous

So Darrell Issa finds it inappropriate for the federal government to be funding medical care for sick 9/11 rescue workers.  Says Rep. Issa, “I have to ask … why the firefighters who went there and everybody in the city of New York needs to come to the federal government for the dollars versus this being primarily a state consideration.”

So as to prove that he’s not just running off incoherently about hating rescue workers, Issa wants you to know he’s proud of his alternative plans for spending federal funds.  To that end, he’s triumphantly sent around a press release listing all of his new earmarks (word doc, h/t Chris Reed).  So what, you’re probably wondering, has Representative Issa chosen to crow about that exemplifies the “local money for local issues, federal money for screw you” spending mantra?  Here’s the quick list:

San Diego Regional Interoperable Computer Aided Dispatch Project -$6 million

San Diego Regional Communications System (RCS) Upgrade -$3.5 million

Gang Prevention Program (City of Oceanside) -$500K

Lake Elsinore Emergency Operations Center -$250K

Murrieta Creek Flood Control Project -$13 million

San Luis Rey Flood Control Project -$7.2 million

Perris II Desalter (Perris, CA) -$2 million

Non-Potable Distribution Facilities and Demineralization/Desalination Recycled Water Treatment and Reclamation Facility Project (Riverside County) -$2 million

Santa Margarita Conjunctive Use Project (Camp Pendleton) -$1 million

San Jacinto & Upper Santa Margarita Watersheds Project -$355K

San Diego County Fire Safety and Fuels Reduction Program -$45 million

Corpsmen/Medics Civilian Nursing Training Program (Oceanside) -$1.6 million

Vista Community Clinic -$1 million

North County Health Project Oceanside Clinic Expansion (Oceanside) -$1 million

Railroad Canyon I-15 interchange project -$8 million

State Route 76 (widen and realign) -$5 million

San Luis Rey Transit Center (Oceanside) -$3.1 million

West Vista Way (City of Vista, widen) -$2 million

French Valley Airport (Temecula) -$1 million

Renovation and expansion of Fallbrook Boys and Girls Club -$500K

Some pretty nice projects in there. But it begs the question: Ahem, why do all these people need “to come to the federal government for the dollars versus this being primarily a state [or local] consideration?” Rep. Issa? Bueller? Bueller?

Lemme just venture one guess. Rescue workers in New York don’t vote in Temecula or Oceanside do they? Oh yeah. So only when Issa is trying to hook it up for his own self should federal money be spent on state and local projects.  Not only cruel and hateful, but selfish and duplicitous too.  He’s building himself quite a nice collection of adjectives.  Full of crap isn’t technically an adjective, but it also applies.

Robert Hamilton is challenging Darrell Issa this year.

Cross posted at San Diego Politico

Darrell Issa Keeps Digging, Still Hates 9/11 Rescue Workers

Yesterday I noted with considerable disdain that Darrell Issa doesn’t give a crap about 9/11 victims and is, not surprisingly, an ass.  Turns out that Issa’s heartless BS isn’t finding much of an audience elsewhere either, as people from coast to coast line up to tear him a new one:

“That is a pretty distorted view of things,” said Frank Fraone, a Menlo Park, Calif., fire chief who led a 67-man crew at Ground Zero. “Whether they’re a couple of planes or a couple of missiles, they still did the same damage.”

“New York was attacked by Al Qaeda. It doesn’t have to be attacked by Congress,” added Long Island Rep. Pete King, a Republican.

“I’m really surprised by Darrell Issa,” King added. “It showed such a cavalier dismissal of what happened to New York. It’s wrong and inexcusable.”

Lorie Van Aucken, who lost her husband, Kenneth, in the attacks, slammed Issa’s “cruel and heartless” comments.

“It’s really discouraging. People stepped up and did the right thing. They sacrificed themselves and now a lot of people are getting really horrible illnesses,” she added.

New York Democratic Reps. Jerry Nadler and Anthony Weiner and GOP Rep. Vito Fossella also added some heated criticisms of Issa.  Issa, however, remains mostly unrepentant:

“I continue to support federal assistance for the victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks,” he said.

But he didn’t retract his wacked-out rhetoric claiming the feds “just threw” buckets of cash at New York for an attack “that had no dirty bomb in it, it had no chemical munitions in it.”

He went on: “I have to ask … why the firefighters who went there and everybody in the city of New York needs to come to the federal government for the dollars versus this being primarily a state consideration.”

In his statement yesterday, Issa insisted he only “asked tough questions about the expenditures” during a hearing Tuesday on an aid bill for sick New Yorkers.

And if that wasn’t enough, contrast this with another recent dumbass maneuver by Issa in which he DID scurry to apologize for his missteps.  Back in February during hearings into a million missing White House emails, Darrell Issa enthusiastically did his water carrying for the Bush administration, declaring it entirely reasonable that converting from Lotus Notes to Outlook would cause such a loss of information.  He went so far as to compare Lotus Notes to wooden wagon wheels and Betamax.  But once big business got agitated about it, Issa fell all over himself and even officially correcting the Congressional record.  But 9/11 rescue workers? Apparently not on the same level as keeping Lotus happy.  I mean after all, according to Issa, 9/11 “simply was an aircraft” hitting the World Trade Center and causing “a fire.”

I don’t know what world Darrell Issa is living in, but he certainly doesn’t have much company.

Robert Hamilton is challenging Darrell Issa this year.

Cross posted at San Diego Politico

Bilbray Prefers Fence over Environment, District, Effective Reform

Does anybody remember when Brian Bilbray sold himself as a moderate? I know it seems like a lifetime ago (or maybe some sort of absurd dream), but it was just 1995 that he first went to Congress.  And I’ve heard the stories from reasonable people with clear eyes about how once he was (relatively) a champion of the environment, particularly clean beaches and water.  He was (and perhaps still is) a surfer and lifeguard after all.  And yet, it’s not at all surprising that he was doing rhetorical backflips in celebration yesterday when Homeland Security decided to waive 30 federal and state environmental laws in order to more quickly build 670 miles of border fence:

“It’s great. This is the priority area where most of the illegal activity is going on and where most of the deaths are occurring,” said Rep. Brian P. Bilbray (R-Solana Beach), chairman of the Immigration Reform Caucus. “The quicker we can get the physical fence up, the sooner we’ll avoid situations like the deaths of agents. And it’s still a national security issue. You just have to stop this kind of open traffic along the border.”

DHS head Michael Chertoff opted to blatantly lie about the situation, claiming:

DHS is neither compromising its commitment to responsible environmental stewardship nor its commitment to solicit and respond to the needs of state, local and tribal governments

Right. Because not adhering to existing environmental law is the same as being commited to it.  Much closer to the truth is:

Critics, however, said the waivers were intended to sidestep growing and unexpectedly fierce opposition — especially in Arizona and in Texas, where concerns have been raised about endangered species and fragile ecosystems along the Rio Grande.

While the section of this project in East San Diego County hasn’t met with much opposition (yet?), Brian Bilbray should know- if he’s been paying any attention at all- that local opposition to the destruction of communities and habitats can be a real pain in the ass for right-wing ideologues.  And as proponents of comprehensive (read: effective) immigration reform note, just building a fence really is a simple-minded approach to securing the border.  Nevermind that impeding the cross-border flow hurts the local economy and the people that Bilbray purports to represent.  This “wall or bust” outlook from Bilbray fits nicely with his America should create more uneducated poor people economic plan and his Protect the employer (as long as they contribute to the campaign) enforcement policy.

Yesterday the Defenders of Wildlife sent around an email asking people to call their representatives in Congress.  If you’re in the 50th, where Brian Bilbray thinks it’s politically astute in 2008 to run to the right of President Bush, you may want to just skip straight to your Senators.

Cheryl Ede and Nick Leibham are Democrats running against Brian Bilbray this year.

Cross posted at San Diego Politico

Darrell Issa: 9/11 Fallout is New York’s Problem

I’m not sure if he’s just a soulless ass or if he’s also actively trying to undermine the entire foundation of post-9/11 conservativism, but Darrell Issa is doing his level best to spit on the rescue workers who got sick at Ground Zero in the aftermath of the twin towers attacks.  He’s flatly refused to vote for federal funding that would provide medical care to these victims of the attack because, in Issa’s mind, it apparently was just a local thing, and not a major one at all:

“It simply was an aircraft, residue of two aircraft, and residue from the materials used to build this building,” Issa said during a hearing into whether a new 9/11 victims’ compensation fund should be launched.

Which is odd since, as Rep. Anthony Weiner notes, “The gentleman voted for [original 9/11 funding] because we had the national sense that this was not an attack on New York City, this was an attack on our country.”

But hey, keep up the dispicably cruel hypocrisy Rep. Issa.  Feel free to even bring some friends along. Because all it proves is that 9/11 to you is nothing more than a tool to intimidate people into sacrificing Constitutional rights and attempt to justify the $3 trillion Iraq boondoggle. That’s when it’s a national issue. That’s when America is at stake. Only when it serves the political interests of Darrell Issa.

But when the heroes who sacrificed at Ground Zero need help? For Darrell Issa, that’s not America’s problem and it apparently sure isn’t his problem. It’s…well…somebody else’s problem.

Robert Hamilton is challenging Darrell Issa this year.

Cross posted at San Diego Politico

Migden Gets Injunction Against FPPC

Campaign finance reform has been bubbling as an issue for a number of years.  And any time someone manages even a small step forward, you know you’re going to have the big money corporations, the Club for Growth, and all other manner of rich righties lining up to defend their right to freely spend their money on as much questionable propaganda as they can muster.  Normally the battle lines are pretty clear on this, ideologically speaking.  That is, of course, unless you subscribe to Sen. Carole Migden’s particular brand of “progressivism”.

After the Fair Political Practices Commission barred her from accessing more than $640,000 from an old campaign account because, well…she didn’t transfer it out of her Assembly campaign account before she left the Assembly (whoops), she sued to get it back.  Free political speech, her argument goes, trumps playing by the rules.

And today, a District Court judge agreed.  U.S. District Court Judge Edmund Brennan granted a temporary injunction against the FPPC’s locking of the account:

“I think serious questions have been demonstrated here as to the constitutionality, as to the manner in which the statute is being applied” by the FPPC, Brennan said at the end of an hour-long hearing.

Migden’s attorneys claim the regulation is to prevent termed-out legislators from plundering their campaign funds for personal use, saying “Migden ‘is not here asking the court, ‘Please allow me to use campaign funds on a new car.'”  (Nevermind that you never know when she might need a new car)

The FPPC claims that she still won’t get her mitts on the money because she’s violated other regulations too (specifically, multiple bank accounts for one campaign committee).  Migden’s lawyers shot back that they’ll just keep suing until they get the money, a plan which, I’m sure, won’t add any motivation to the FPPC’s $9 million countersuit against Migden for assorted sketchy (and allegedly not allowed) finance issues.

So our saga continues.  After getting her CDP endorsement shot down convincingly (71.3% of the floor) on Sunday, Migden has a brief glimpse of a recovery thanks to throwing campaign finance regulation under the bus for her personal benefit.  One thing that struck me about her, ahem, perplexing implosion over the weekend was that it was the worst possible time for it.  2,000 delegates trapped together in San Jose for two days is not the time to give people something to talk about.  Right after being repudiated by those same people seems an odd time to throw progressive principles by the wayside in the name of political survival.

Debra Bowen wants to talk with you on Wednesday

Full disclosure: I work for the Courage Campaign

A couple weeks ago, Secretary of State Debra Bowen visited San Diego to participate in a panel discussion on election integrity.  She talked about the double bubble trouble we had with Dean Logan.  She talked about catching Dirty Tricksters red handed.  But mostly she talked about how vital a role the activists of the grassroots are to keeping her informed when they see something that just doesn’t seem right.

Well now she wants to talk to you, and Rick Jacobs has all you need to know:

I want to express my thanks to you and then extend a special invitation to spend some time on Wednesday with someone who personifies the courageous spirit Susan B. Anthony wrote about over 100 years ago.

But first off, thank you for your overwhelming support for our “Yacht Party” TV ad campaign.

Because of you, Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez and our friends at United Healthcare Workers West (SEIU-UHW), we’ve raised $28,743 to re-brand the Republicans for their refusal to close the “yacht tax” loophole despite our state’s catastrophic budget crisis. Your generosity made it possible for the “Yacht Party” TV ad — an idea originally brainstormed by a blogger on Calitics — to air across California, from CNN and MSNBC to the Daily Show and Colbert Report.

One action at a time, grassroots and netroots activists, union members and elected leaders are working with the Courage Campaign to challenge the status quo and change California.

Often the first step in changing the status quo is changing the conversation. That’s why, on Wednesday (April 2), we’re holding the first in our new series of Courage Campaign Conversations — regular conference calls with leaders and activists working to make 2008 a new era for progressive politics in California. Already, we have commitments from Assembly Speaker-Elect Karen Bass and Senate President Pro Tem-Elect Darrell Steinberg (stay tuned for more details).

We’re kicking off our first Courage Campaign Conversation on Wednesday with the honoree receiving next month’s “Profile in Courage” Award — the prestigious award given by the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library to leaders who make “courageous decisions of conscience without regard for personal or professional consequences”:

Secretary of State Debra Bowen.

This Wednesday, April 2, at 6 p.m., please join us for a special Courage Campaign Conversation with Secretary Bowen. Space on this conference call is limited so hurry now to reserve a spot before we run out:

http://www.couragecampaign.org/BowenCall

Shortly after her election, Secretary Bowen boldly decided to order a “Top to Bottom Review” of California’s electronic voting machines, garnering headlines across the country. The results, exposing gaping security holes, were so shocking that she moved immediately to decertify thousands of machines as well as sue Election Systems & Software (ES&S) for $15 million in fines and reimbursements, as reported by the San Francisco Chronicle:

“ES&S ignored the law over and over and over again, and it got caught,” Bowen said in a statement after filing suit against the company. “I am not going to stand on the sidelines and watch a voting system vendor come into the state, ignore the laws and make millions of dollars from California’s taxpayers in the process.”

Now, as a result of this courageous action, there is speculation that ES&S will counter-sue. Meanwhile, Secretary Bowen has also come under under attack by some county elections officials who have filed lawsuits attempting to undermine Bowen’s authority.

Fortunately, the same grassroots and netroots community that helped Bowen become Secretary of State in 2006 is now pushing back. Inspired by Bowen’s steadfast commitment to secure, accurate and transparent elections, a grassroots network called “Stand Firm with Debra Bowen” has been working to defend her and protect the rights of voters across California, organizing letter-writing campaigns and online action. As the group recently wrote in its newsletter:

The drumbeat of attacks on Bowen always points to the same source: an unholy alliance of some county registrars and e-voting machine vendors with consistent help from Republican operatives looking to score political points.

Secretary Bowen greatly appreciates your support. And now she wants to talk with you. Please join us on Wednesday, April 2, at 6 p.m. for our first Courage Campaign Conversation of 2008.

Click here to reserve a spot, get the dial-in details, and suggest a question for Secretary Bowen:

http://www.couragecampaign.org/BowenCall

I hope you will join us and tell your friends about this unique opportunity to speak with one of California’s most impressive leaders and congratulate her on receiving the John F. Kennedy “Profile in Courage” Award.

Thank you for helping the Courage Campaign protect our democracy by protecting our elections.

Rick Jacobs

Chair

P.S. Whether it’s helping re-frame the Republicans as the “Yacht Party,” kill the GOP’s electoral college “dirty trick,” count the “double bubble” votes in Los Angeles County, or block Blackwater’s base on the California border, your support is vital to our success.

Unfortunately, putting on large conference calls can be very expensive. Whether or not you can make this Courage Campaign Conversation with Secretary Bowen, please consider contributing what you can today to help us make this special call possible: